[2022] KEHC 11973 (KLR)

[2022] KEHC 11973 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant was entitled to execute the certificate of confirmation of grant issued on 4th March 2014, as the respondent's application for revocation had been dismissed and no appeal or stay had been properly filed. The respondent's mere intention to appeal, without actual steps taken or a...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEHC 11973 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Josephine Chepngetich Langat; Respondent: Leah Chebii Langat
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kericho
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 100 of 2012
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Police Assistance in Execution of Confirmed Grant
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
AN Ongeri
Legal Topics
Administration of Estates, Confirmation of Grant, Execution of Court Orders, Intestate Succession
Source Language
en
Family and Children Civil Procedure Administration of Estates Confirmation of Grant Execution of Court Orders Intestate Succession

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Josephine Chepngetich Langat

Applicant

Leah Chebii Langat

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Police Assistance in Execution of Confirmed Grant

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to police assistance in executing the certificate of confirmation of grant for the estate of the deceased.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent's intention to appeal justifies staying execution of the confirmed grant.
  3. 3 Whether the division of the estate as per the confirmed grant should proceed despite the respondent's objections.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant was entitled to execute the certificate of confirmation of grant issued on 4th March 2014, as the respondent's application for revocation had been dismissed and no appeal or stay had been properly filed. The respondent's mere intention to appeal, without actual steps taken or a stay in place, did not justify delaying the execution of the confirmed grant. The court accepted the applicant's evidence that the respondent had obstructed the subdivision process and that police assistance was necessary to ensure peaceful execution. The court therefore allowed the application, ordered the execution of the certificate of confirmation, directed the Officer...

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • The application dated 24/1/2022 is allowed as prayed.
  • The certificate of confirmation of grant to be executed.