[2019] KEHC 6834 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant's complaint regarding exclusion from the distribution of her late husband's estate was justified. However, since she was not a beneficiary of the estate of Samuel Muchiri Njuguna, revocation of the grant in that estate was not warranted. The court determined that the previous order...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEHC 6834 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Esther Wacheke Githinji
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 444 of 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- Application for revocation of grant declined; previous order reviewed and set aside; directions given for proper administration of Josphat Muchangi Muriithi's estate.
- Judges
- A Ali-Aroni
- Legal Topics
- Grant of Representation, Estate Distribution, Rectification of Grant
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Esther Wacheke Githinji
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant, as widow of Josphat Muchangi Muriithi, was improperly excluded from the distribution of her late husband's estate.
- 2 Whether the rectification of grant to include L.R. No. 1317/195 and vest it in trust for Kelvin Muriithi Muchangi was proper.
- 3 Whether the grant in respect of Samuel Muchiri Njuguna's estate should be revoked.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant's complaint regarding exclusion from the distribution of her late husband's estate was justified. However, since she was not a beneficiary of the estate of Samuel Muchiri Njuguna, revocation of the grant in that estate was not warranted. The court determined that the previous order allowing registration of L.R. No. 1317/195 in the name of Stephen Mbugua Githuka to hold in trust for Kelvin Muriithi Muchangi was improper, as the proper procedure for administration and distribution of Josphat Muchangi Muriithi's estate had not been followed. The court reviewed and set aside the earlier order, directing that the property be registered for the benefit of the...
Court Disposition
Application for revocation of grant declined; previous order reviewed and set aside; directions given for proper administration of Josphat Muchangi Muriithi's estate.
Orders
- The application to revoke the grant in respect of Samuel Muchiri Njuguna's estate is declined.
- The order issued on 6th December 2011 allowing registration of L.R. No. 1317/195 in the name of Stephen Mbugua Githuka to hold in trust for Kelvin Muriithi Muchangi is reviewed and set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
22 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAIROBI
FAMILY DIVISION
SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 444 OF 2003
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF SAMWEL MUCHIRI NJUGUNA (DECEASED)
ESTHER WACHEKE GITHINJI...........................................................................APPLICANT
JUDGMENT
1. The deceased in this matter Samwel Muchiri Njuguna sold L.R.No. 1317/195 to Josephat Muchangi Muriithi (deceased) the husband to the Applicant herein Esther Wacheke Githinji a fact acknowledged by all parties.
2. On the 29th of September 2011 the administrators of this estateapplied for rectification of the grant herein so as to include the subject matter L.R. 1317/195 in the grant and for the same to be “inherited’ by Stephen Mbugua Githuka who will hold the same in trust for Kelvin Muriithi Muchangi.
3. Stephen Mbugua Githuka is said to be a brother to the deceased.Josphat Muchangi Mureithi and Kelvin Muriithi Muchangi son of the deceased.
4. In this cause it appears that distribution of two estates have beenDealt with i.e. estate of Samuel Muchiri Njuguna and that of Josphat Muchangi Muriithi.
5. Firstly, two estates cannot be administered under one file. Secondlyit is not clear in what capacity Stephen Mbugua Githuka was inheriting the property and holding it in trust, thirdly, the deceased Josphat Muchangi Muriithi had a wife and it appears that she was not consulted in the matter as referred above. Fourthly it is not clear whether grant of administration of the estate of Josphat Muchangi Muriithi was obtained by the wife, or brother or son to be able to deal with his estate.
6. The only issue the Applicant has raised in the applicationconcerns her late husband’s estate and distribution without her involvement which complaint is justifiable. However considering that the Applicant is not a beneficiary of this particular estate of Samuel Muchiri Njuguna it will not be justifiable to revoke the grant herein which I hereby decline to do.
7. I believe that if Njagi J who heard the application dated 29thSeptember, 2011 had the information that has been placed before court today he would not have granted the order and for the reasons enumerated above. I therefore review the orders issued on the 6th of December, 2011 allowing registration of property L.R. No. 1317/195 in the names of Stephen Mbugua Githuka to hold in trust for Kelvin Muriithi Muchangi so that the property will now be registered for the benefit of the estate of Josphat Muriithi Muchangi.
8. The widow is advised to apply together with the son for grant ofrepresentation of the estate of Josphat Muriithi Muchangi so that the issue of representation and distribution of the estate of Josphat Muchangi Muriithi can be dealt with.
9. If this has been done then the widow can make a claim under thatsuccession cause.
10. Costs in the cause.
DATED, SIGNEDandDELIVEREDat NAIROBI this 23rd DAY OF May, 2019.
....................
ALI-ARONI
JUDGE