[2019] KEHC 7320 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 7320 (KLR)

The court found that it lacked jurisdiction to revoke a grant of probate issued by the Kadhi's Court except through the appellate process. The application was further found to be incompetent and irregular as it was filed by a firm of advocates not properly on record in the proceedings. Even if the application had...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEHC 7320 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Nazir Shah Mohammed; Respondent: Githui John of Githui & Company Advocates
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nakuru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Appeal 1 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Succession Appeal / Ruling on Interlocutory Application Within Appeal
Outcome
application struck out
Judges
AG Ndung'u
Legal Topics
Probate Revocation, Will Validity, Jurisdiction of High Court, Representation of Parties
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Family and Children Probate Revocation Will Validity Jurisdiction of High Court Representation of Parties

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Nazir Shah Mohammed

Appellant

Githui John of Githui & Company Advocates

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Appeal / Ruling on Interlocutory Application Within Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to revoke a grant of probate issued by the Kadhi's Court other than through an appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the application is competent given it was filed by advocates not properly on record.
  3. 3 Whether the Will dated 19th August 2018 was validly executed and free from undue influence or incapacity.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that it lacked jurisdiction to revoke a grant of probate issued by the Kadhi's Court except through the appellate process. The application was further found to be incompetent and irregular as it was filed by a firm of advocates not properly on record in the proceedings. Even if the application had legal standing, the procedural irregularity rendered it fatally defective. Consequently, the application was struck out for want of jurisdiction and for being improperly before the court.

Court Disposition

application struck out

Orders

  • The application dated 2/4/2019 is struck out.
  • No orders as to costs.