[2024] KEHC 10043 (KLR)

[2024] KEHC 10043 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had been properly substituted as administrator by a previous court order dated 12.3.2024, and that the registry had not yet issued an amended certificate of confirmation of grant to reflect this substitution. The application before the court was therefore for an administrative...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEHC 10043 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: William Wamalwa Wekunda; Applicant: Donald Okumu Sikunyili; Deceased: Stephen Wekunda; Deceased: Herman Okumu Murunga
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Bungoma
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 64 of 1998
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Amended Certificate of Confirmation of Grant
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
REA Ougo
Legal Topics
Succession, Grant Confirmation, Administrator Substitution
Source Language
en
Family and Children Succession Grant Confirmation Administrator Substitution

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

William Wamalwa Wekunda

Applicant

Donald Okumu Sikunyili

Applicant

Stephen Wekunda

Deceased

Herman Okumu Murunga

Deceased

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Amended Certificate of Confirmation of Grant

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to an amended certificate of confirmation of grant following substitution of deceased administrators.
  2. 2 Whether the court should direct the registry to issue the amended certificate as per the ruling of 12.3.2024.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had been properly substituted as administrator by a previous court order dated 12.3.2024, and that the registry had not yet issued an amended certificate of confirmation of grant to reflect this substitution. The application before the court was therefore for an administrative action to implement the court's earlier ruling. The court held that there was no opposition to the application and that the applicant was entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the court directed the in-charge of the concerned registry to issue an amended certificate of confirmation of grant in line with the ruling of 12.3.2024. No order as to costs was made.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • The in-charge of the concerned registry shall issue an amended certificate of confirmation of grant in line with the court’s ruling dated 12.3.2024.
  • No order as to costs.