[2021] KEHC 8323 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 8323 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant's summons for confirmation of grant was properly presented, with evidence of consent from the second house and a clear schedule of distribution. The respondents, despite being given notice and directions in open court, failed to appear and prosecute their application or contest the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 8323 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Temturia Nasaka Simiyu; Respondent: Isaac Mandila Simiyu; Respondent: Timothy Ngurete Simiyu
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kakamega
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 17 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Judgment on Confirmation of Grant
Outcome
Summons for confirmation of grant dated 24th September 2020 allowed; respondents' application dismissed.
Judges
DN Musyoka
Legal Topics
Succession, Confirmation of Grant, Distribution of Estate, Administration of Estates, Intestate Succession
Source Language
en
Family and Children Succession Confirmation of Grant Distribution of Estate Administration of Estates Intestate Succession

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Temturia Nasaka Simiyu

Applicant

Isaac Mandila Simiyu

Respondent

Timothy Ngurete Simiyu

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Judgment on Confirmation of Grant

  1. 1 Whether the grant of letters of administration intestate should be confirmed in the terms proposed by the applicant.
  2. 2 Whether the distribution of the deceased's estate should follow the schedule proposed by the applicant or the respondents.
  3. 3 Whether all beneficiaries were properly consulted and consented to the proposed mode of distribution.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant's summons for confirmation of grant was properly presented, with evidence of consent from the second house and a clear schedule of distribution. The respondents, despite being given notice and directions in open court, failed to appear and prosecute their application or contest the applicant's proposals. The court held that in the absence of the respondents and any contrary evidence, the applicant's case must succeed. The court confirmed the grant in the terms proposed by the applicant, with the modification that Ndivisi/Muhuu/514 and Ndivisi/Muhuu/517 are to be shared equally among the named members of the first house, and Kakamega/Mabusi/101 shall...

Court Disposition

Summons for confirmation of grant dated 24th September 2020 allowed; respondents' application dismissed.

Orders

  • The Summons for Confirmation of Grant dated 24th September 2020 is allowed.
  • The grant made on 27th February 2020 is confirmed.