[2025] KEHC 3032 (KLR)
The court found that the applicants, though not individually named in the certificate of confirmation, were recognized as purchasers in the judgment and thus entitled to the property. The respondent's refusal to surrender the original title deed was unjustified and hindered the execution of the court's judgment. The...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] KEHC 3032 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Jane Wairimu Mathenge; Respondent: David Gitahi Nduru; Respondent: Joel Waweru Kariuki
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nyandarua
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Probate & Administration 3 of 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Probate and Administration / Ruling on Summons for Orders Relating to Surrender of Title Deed and Execution of Transfer Documents
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Judges
- KW Kiarie
- Legal Topics
- Succession, Confirmation of Grant, Distribution of Estate, Purchaser Rights
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jane Wairimu Mathenge
Applicant
David Gitahi Nduru
Respondent
Joel Waweru Kariuki
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Probate and Administration / Ruling on Summons for Orders Relating to Surrender of Title Deed and Execution of Transfer Documents
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent should be compelled to surrender the original title deed for Nyandarua/Leshau/Mbuyu Block 2 (Karai)/152 for subdivision and transfer to beneficiaries.
- 2 Whether the requirement for production of the original title deed by applicants should be dispensed with.
- 3 Whether the respondent should be compelled to execute all subdivision and transfer documents, or the Deputy Registrar be authorized to sign in default.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants, though not individually named in the certificate of confirmation, were recognized as purchasers in the judgment and thus entitled to the property. The respondent's refusal to surrender the original title deed was unjustified and hindered the execution of the court's judgment. The court held that the application was merited and allowed the prayers sought to ensure the applicants could enjoy the fruits of the judgment and bring the long-standing dispute to an end. The court emphasized that procedural technicalities should not defeat substantive justice, especially where the rights of purchasers had been recognized in the judgment.
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- The respondent, David Gitahi Nduru, is compelled to immediately surrender the original title deed for Nyandarua/Leshau/Mbuyu Block 2 (Karai)/152 to enable subdivision and transfer to the respective beneficiaries.
- The requirement for the applicants to produce the original title deed for Nyandarua/Leshau/Mbuyu Block 2 (Karai)/152 is dispensed with.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
26 paragraphs
In re Estate of Simon Nduru Kariuki (Deceased) (Probate & Administration 3 of 2025) [2025] KEHC 3032 (KLR) (Family) (17 March 2025) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 3032 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Nyandarua
Family
Probate & Administration 3 of 2025
KW Kiarie, J
March 17, 2025
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF: SIMON NDURU KARIUKI
Between
David Gitahi Nduru
Petitioner
and
Joel Waweru Kariuki
Protestor
and
Jane Wairimu Mathenge
Purchaser
Ruling
1. Jane Wairimu Mathenge & 37 others, the applicants herein, moved the court by way of summons dated the 1st day of August 2024. The application was brought under Rule 49 of Probate and Administration Rules & Article 159 (2) (b) of the Constitution of Kenya. They are seeking the following grounds:a.That an order be issued compelling the respondent, David Gitahi Nduru, to immediately surrender the original title deed for Nyandarua/Leshau /Mbuyu Block 2 (Karai)/152 to enable sub-division and subsequent transfer to the respective beneficiaries.b.That alternatively, an order do issue that the County Government Surveyor’s and the Land Registrar’s requirement for parties to produce the original title deed for Nyandarua/Leshau/Mbuyu Block 2 (Karai)/152 by applicants be dispensed with.c.That an order to issue compelling the respondent to execute all the sub-division and transfer documents for Nyandarua/Leshau/Mbuyu block 2 (Karai) 152 and, in default, the Deputy Registrar to authorized to sign.d.That the respondent does pay the costs of this applicatione.That this honourable court be pleased to issue any other order that it may deem just and expedient in the interest of justice.
2. The application was premised on the following grounds:a.That this court delivered a judgment in this cause on 13th October 2022 and further issued a certificate of confirmation of grant on the same day in which the applicants are entitled to 38 plots.b.That since confirmation of the grant, the applicants have tried everything within their efforts to have the respondent surrender the original title deed, but he has adamantly refused to surrender the same for subdivision.c.That the refusal by the respondent to surrender the original title deed for Nyandarua/ Leshau/ Mbuyu block 2 (Karai)/152 has made it impossible to carry out subdivision and/or any further transaction.d.That the act of the respondent to remain with the original title deed is illegal and thus calls for the Court’s intervention.e.That the court ought to consider the age of the dispute herein as the suit was filed almost 8 years ago, and it is thus necessary that this court grant the orders sought to ensure the applicants enjoy the fruits of the judgment.f.That this court should not issue orders in vain, and there is a need to bring this matter to an end and to avoid a situation where the parties may be forced to shuttle back and forth between this court and the office of the Land Registrar.g.That it is fair and just that is application be allowed as prayed as there is no prejudice that there will occasioned to the respondent.
3. The petitioner/respondent opposed the application on the following grounds:a.The applicants are not parties to the succession cause.b.The applicants do not appear in the certificate of confirmation as beneficiaries of Simon Nduru Kariuki's estate.c.The application is an abuse of the court process.
4. Form P. & A. 5 lists eighteen purchasers who have been described as beneficiaries. Jane Wairimu Mathenge does not appear among them. However, the judgment of this court dated 13th October 2022 recognized the existence of purchasers and confirmed the grant to that effect. Failure to name each purchaser cannot defeat the judgment in their favour.
5. The contention that the purchasers were not party to the succession cause is erroneous.
6. I find that the application is merited and allow it in terms of prayers (a) to (d).
DELIVERED AND SIGNED AT NYANDARUA THIS 17TH DAY OF MARCH 2025. KIARIE WAWERU KIARIEJUDGE