[2020] KEHC 8124 (KLR)
The court found that the Respondent knowingly misrepresented material facts regarding the ownership of L.R. NO. NANDI/KAPSENGERE/175 in his application for confirmation of grant, despite clear evidence from the official search and the Chief's letter that the property was co-owned by three individuals. The issuance...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] KEHC 8124 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Elizabeth Jebitok Ageya; Respondent: Solomon Kipkemboi Maiyo
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisumu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 528 of 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Annulment of Grant
- Outcome
- Certificate of Confirmation of Grant dated 29th August 2017 annulled; costs awarded to the Applicant.
- Judges
- TW Cherere
- Legal Topics
- Succession of Estates, Confirmation of Grant, Annulment of Grant, Co Ownership of Land
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Elizabeth Jebitok Ageya
Applicant
Solomon Kipkemboi Maiyo
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Annulment of Grant
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Certificate of Confirmation of Grant issued to the Respondent should be annulled due to misrepresentation of ownership of L.R. NO. NANDI/KAPSENGERE/175.
- 2 Whether parallel succession proceedings and conflicting grants can subsist regarding the same estate and property.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the Respondent knowingly misrepresented material facts regarding the ownership of L.R. NO. NANDI/KAPSENGERE/175 in his application for confirmation of grant, despite clear evidence from the official search and the Chief's letter that the property was co-owned by three individuals. The issuance of two conflicting certificates of confirmation of grant by different courts in respect of the same estate and property created an untenable legal situation. As the Respondent's certificate was obtained on the basis of an untruth, the court held that it must be annulled to prevent injustice and uphold the integrity of the succession process.
Court Disposition
Certificate of Confirmation of Grant dated 29th August 2017 annulled; costs awarded to the Applicant.
Orders
- The Certificate of Confirmation of Grant dated 29th August 2017 issued to the Respondent is annulled forthwith.
- The costs of the application dated 17th September 2018 are awarded to the Applicant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
47 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT KISUMU
SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 528 OF 2015
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF SIMON OTIENDE
ARAPKONENAliasSIMION OTIENDE ARAP KONEN - DECEASED
ELIZABETH JEBITOK AGEYA......................................OBJECTOR/APPLICANT
-VERSUS -
SOLOMON KIPKEMBOI MAIYO.....................................................RESPONDENT
RULING
The application before me is for the annulment of the Grant of Letters of Administration which were issued to the Respondent, SOLOMON KIPKEMBOI MAIYO.
1. It is common ground that the Respondent had filed a Succession Cause at the Principal Magistrate’s Court, Kapsabet. The said cause is Succession Cause No. 135 of 2016, which is in relation to the Estate of SIMON OTIENDE ARAP KONENAliasSIMION OTIENDE ARAP KONEN.
2. The Petition was filed on 9th September 2016. It was then gazetted on 6th January 2017.
3. The record of proceedings shows that on 2nd August 2017, the court issued a Grant of Letters of Administration Intestate, to the Respondent.
4. Thereafter, on 29th August 2017 the learned Senior Resident Magistrate, Hon. E.A. Obina, issued a Certificate of Confirmation of Grant.
5. Pursuant to the Certificate of Grant, the property L.R. NO. NANDI/KAPSENGERE/175was to be transferred to the Respondent.
6. Meanwhile, the Applicant, ELIZABETH JEBITOK AGEYA, had lodged a Citation in this court on 15th March 2015.
7. The Citee in that Citation was the Respondent herein.
8. On 21st December 2015 the Applicant lodged a Petition in this court. The said Petition was gazetted on 19th August 2016.
9. The record of the proceedings shows that on 28th September 2016, Majanja J. issued a Grant of Letters of Administration Intestate, to the Applicant.
10. Thereafter, the Court issued a Certificate of Confirmation of Grant on 27th July 2017.
11. Pursuant to the said Certificate of Confirmation of Grant, the Applicant was to get one-third (1/3) share in the property L.R. NO. NANDI/KAPSENGERE/175.
12. At this stage it is necessary to clarify some issues concerning the property L.R. NO. NANDI/KAPSENGERE/175.
13. The said property is registered in the names of three persons, namely;
a. Elizabeth Jebitok Ageya;
b. Simon Otiende Arap Konen; and
c. Ochieng Arap Maiyo.
14. Each of the said 3 persons is indicated as owning one-third (1/3) share, in the property.
15. A reading of the proceedings leading up to the confirmation of the Grant in this case, shows that the Applicant had asserted that she had purchased the one-third (1/3) share which had registered in the name of the deceased SIMON OTIENDE ARAP KONEN.
16. Therefore, if the Certificate of Confirmation of the Grant in this case, was given effect, the Applicant would be the owner of two-thirds (2/3) of the property: That is because apart from the one-third (1/3) already registered in her name, the Applicant stated that she had purchased the one-third (1/3) which was originally owned by the deceased.
17. By virtue of the Certificate of Grant issued by the High Court, the Applicant would be entitled to two-thirds (2/3) of L.R. NO. NANDI/KAPSENGERE/175.
18. Meanwhile, by virtue of the Certificate of Grant issued by the Principal Magistrate’s Court Kapsabet, the Respondent would be entitled to the whole parcel of land known as L.R. NO. NANDI/KAPSENGERE/175.
19. The two certificates of confirmation of Grant are inconsistent. If both of them were to be executed, there would be a clash of titanic proportions.
20. The Respondent cannot get the whole parcel of land which the High Court has a large portion of to the Applicant.
21. The converse is equally true; that the Applicant cannot get two-thirds (2/3) of the parcel of land when the Principal Magistrate’s Court has awarded it to the Respondent.
22. The existence of two parallel proceedings, before two different courts, in respect to the Succession of one deceased person, has given rise to positions which are not capable of being reconciled, when the orders issued by the two courts continue subsisting.
23. But more significantly, I note that when the Respondent lodged his Petition for Letters of Administration Intestate, he exhibited a Certificate of Official Search which clearly showed that L.R. NO. NANDI/KAPSENGERE/175was owned by 3 persons, namely Elizabeth Jebitok Ageya, Simon Otieno Arap Konen and Ochieng Arap Maiyo.
25. By a letter dated 19th August 2016, the Chief of Terik Location, Mr. Elijah Kiplagat, also stated that the parcel of land in issue belonged to the 3 named persons.
25. However, by an affidavit sworn on 29th August 2017, the Respondent supported his application for confirmation of the Grant, by asserting that he was entitled to the WHOLEparcel of land, L.R. NO. NANDI/KAPSENGERE/175.
26. I find that that deposition was known by the Respondent to be untrue. Therefore, as the certificate of confirmation was issued based on an untruth, it must be annulled.
27. Accordingly, the Certificate of Confirmation of Grant dated 29th August 2017 is hereby annulled forthwith.
28. The costs of the application dated 17th September 2018 are awarded to the Applicant.
FRED A. OCHIENG
JUDGE
DATED, SIGNEDandDELIVERED at KISUMU This28thday ofJanuary2020
T.W. CHERERE
JUDGE