[2023] KEHC 22092 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant had demonstrated an error in the name of the deceased as it appeared in the confirmed grant, compared to the name on the certificate of title for a parcel of land forming part of the estate. The court held that section 74 of the Law of Succession Act and Rule 43(1) of the Probate...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEHC 22092 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Alice Wamoro Njau
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 1921 of 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Rectification of Grant
- Outcome
- summons for rectification of grant allowed
- Judges
- EKO Ogola
- Legal Topics
- Rectification of Grant, Errors in Names, Probate and Administration, Law of Succession, Confirmation of Grant
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alice Wamoro Njau
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Rectification of Grant
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should rectify the confirmed grant to include the alias 'S.P. Njau' in the deceased's name as it appears on the certificate of title for land parcel Nyandarua/Kirima/2090.
- 2 Whether the requirements under section 74 of the Law of Succession Act and Rule 43(1) of the Probate and Administration Rules for rectification of grant are met.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant had demonstrated an error in the name of the deceased as it appeared in the confirmed grant, compared to the name on the certificate of title for a parcel of land forming part of the estate. The court held that section 74 of the Law of Succession Act and Rule 43(1) of the Probate and Administration Rules empower the court to rectify such errors in names and descriptions. Upon reviewing the record and supporting documents, the court was satisfied that both names referred to the deceased and that rectification was warranted to ensure the grant accurately reflected the deceased's identity as required by law. The summons for rectification was therefore...
Court Disposition
summons for rectification of grant allowed
Orders
- The confirmed grant is rectified to read 'Simon Peter Njau alias S.P. Njau' as the name of the deceased.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
17 paragraphs
In re Estate of Simon Peter Njau (Deceased) (Succession Cause 1921 of 2021) [2023] KEHC 22092 (KLR) (Family) (26 June 2023) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 22092 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Family
Succession Cause 1921 of 2021
EKO Ogola, J
June 26, 2023
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF SIMON PETER NJAU (DECEASED)
Ruling
1. The Summons before me is dated 22nd February 2023. The Administrator, Alice Wamoro Njau prays for the following:-a.That the deceased name to read Simon Peter Njau alias S.P. Njau as in Certificate of Title for Land Parcel No. Nyandarua/ Kirima/2090b.The cost of this Application be provided for.
2. The Certificate of Grant was issued to Alice Wamoro Njau on 28th November 2022. Part of the deceased estate include land known as Nyandarua/Kirima/2090 registered to the deceased in his name alias S.P. Njau. The Certificate of Confirmation of Grant names the decease as Simon Peter Njau. The Administrator swears in her Affidavit in support of the Summons for Rectification that both names refer to the deceased therefore the Certificate of Confirmation of grant should read, ‘Simon Peter Njau alias S.P. Njau’.
3. Rectification of grants is provided for in section 74 of the Law of Succession Act and Rule 43(1) of the Probate and Administration Rules. Section 74 provides as follows:“74. Errors may be rectified by court:Errors in names and descriptions, or in setting forth the time and place of the deceased’s death, or the purpose in a limited grant, may be rectified by the court, and the grant of representation, whether before or after confirmation, may be altered and amended accordingly.”
4. Rule 43(1) provides as follows:“Where the holder of a grant seeks pursuant to the provisions of section 74 of the Act rectification of an error in the grant as to the names or descriptions of any person or thing or as to the time or place of death of the deceased or, in the case of a limited grant, the purpose for which the grant was made, he shall apply by summons in Form 110 for such rectification through the registry and in the cause in which the grant was made.”
5. From the language of section 74 of the Law of Succession Act and Rule 43(1) of the Probate and Administration Rules, the scope of rectification of grants of representation is limited to errors in names and descriptions, or in setting forth the time and place of the deceased’s death, or the purpose in a limited grant. The court may rectify errors in names and descriptions, and the grant of representation, whether before or after confirmation, may be altered and amended accordingly.
6. In this instant Summons for Rectification of Confirmed Grant, the Administrator has demonstrated the error in the name of the deceased and having perused the record of the Court, the annextures to the Summons, and having considered the applicable law, I allow the Summon as prayed.It is so ordered.
DATED AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBI THIS 26TH DAY OF JUNE 2023………………………………………………E.K. OGOLAJUDGEIn the presence of:N/A for the AdministratorsGisiele Muthoni Court Assistant.