[2021] KEHC 7657 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 7657 (KLR)

The court found that the Certificate of Confirmation of Grant required LR. NO. NTIMA/IGOKI/307 to be subdivided into four equal portions among the named beneficiaries. The evidence showed that the land had already been subdivided and title deeds issued, and the applicant did not provide evidence to the contrary. The...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 7657 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Charles Manyara Stanley; Respondent: Rebecca Kanaitore M’Itirimania; Respondent: Florence Kirugi M’Itirimania; Respondent: Mary Karimi; Respondent: George Mwenda Tirimania; Respondent: Edward Ndumba Tirimania
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 522 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Notice of Motion to Resurvey and Cancel Titles
Outcome
application dismissed with costs to the respondents
Judges
TW Cherere
Legal Topics
Succession, Confirmation of Grant, Distribution of Estate, Jurisdiction of Family Court
Source Language
en
Family and Children Succession Confirmation of Grant Distribution of Estate Jurisdiction of Family Court

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Charles Manyara Stanley

Applicant

Rebecca Kanaitore M’Itirimania

Respondent

Florence Kirugi M’Itirimania

Respondent

Mary Karimi

Respondent

George Mwenda Tirimania

Respondent

Edward Ndumba Tirimania

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Notice of Motion to Resurvey and Cancel Titles

  1. 1 Whether the subdivision of LR. NO. NTIMA/IGOKI/307 complied with the Certificate of Confirmation of Grant.
  2. 2 Whether the court has jurisdiction to order resurvey and cancellation of titles after subdivision and issuance of title deeds.
  3. 3 Whether any beneficiary is entitled to a preferred portion of the subdivided land.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Certificate of Confirmation of Grant required LR. NO. NTIMA/IGOKI/307 to be subdivided into four equal portions among the named beneficiaries. The evidence showed that the land had already been subdivided and title deeds issued, and the applicant did not provide evidence to the contrary. The court determined that it had no jurisdiction to interfere with the distribution or order a resurvey and cancellation of titles, as the estate no longer included the subject land. Furthermore, absent an agreement or a complete gift inter vivos, no beneficiary could claim a preferred portion. The application was therefore without merit and dismissed with costs to the respondents.

Court Disposition

application dismissed with costs to the respondents

Orders

  • The notice of motion dated 02nd January, 2020 is dismissed with costs to the respondents.