[2024] KEHC 10982 (KLR)

[2024] KEHC 10982 (KLR)

The court found that the application for execution of the partial confirmation of grant was merited, as the absence of the third administrator residing outside Kenya had caused undue delay in the distribution of the estate. The court held that the request for revocation of the partial confirmation of grant, raised...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEHC 10982 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Edward Ngugi Kingangi; Applicant: Edwin Ngugi Kingangi; Respondent: Jennifer Mwihaki Kingangi
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 367 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Execution of Partial Confirmation of Grant
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
HK Chemitei
Legal Topics
Administration of Estates, Confirmation of Grant, Distribution of Estate, Rectification of Grant, Succession Procedure
Source Language
en
Family and Children Civil Procedure Administration of Estates Confirmation of Grant Distribution of Estate Rectification of Grant Succession Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Edward Ngugi Kingangi

Applicant

Edwin Ngugi Kingangi

Applicant

Jennifer Mwihaki Kingangi

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Execution of Partial Confirmation of Grant

  1. 1 Whether the two available administrators can execute transmission, transfer, and bank documents for the estate assets in accordance with the partial confirmation of grant dated 2nd June 2021.
  2. 2 Whether the request for revocation of the partial confirmation of grant raised in a replying affidavit is procedurally proper and merited.
  3. 3 Whether errors in property descriptions warrant revocation or amendment of the partial grant.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the application for execution of the partial confirmation of grant was merited, as the absence of the third administrator residing outside Kenya had caused undue delay in the distribution of the estate. The court held that the request for revocation of the partial confirmation of grant, raised by the respondent in a replying affidavit, was procedurally improper and unmerited, as no formal application for revocation or amendment had been filed. The court further held that any errors in the description of properties in the partial confirmation did not justify revocation of the grant but could be addressed through rectification. The court concluded that authorizing the...

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • Any two administrators of the estate are authorized to execute the transmission, transfer, and bank documents in respect of the estate assets to the heirs as denoted in the partial confirmation of grant dated 2nd June 2021.
  • If there are errors in the property descriptions, the same may be corrected by way of rectification of the grant.