[2019] KEHC 2193 (KLR)
The court found that the two surveyor's reports and sketch plans submitted by the applicant and respondent were completely at variance, making it impossible to fairly determine the matter based solely on the documents. To ensure a just and equitable resolution of the dispute regarding the subdivision of the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEHC 2193 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: John Muchiri Kiriba; Respondent: Peter Kamau Kiriba
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 1568 of 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Interlocutory Ruling on Application for Adoption of Surveyor's Report and Execution of Transmission Documents
- Outcome
- Application for adoption of applicant's surveyor's report and related prayers deferred pending further hearing.
- Judges
- A Ali-Aroni
- Legal Topics
- Distribution of Estate, Confirmation of Grant, Subdivision of Land, Beneficiary Disputes
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Muchiri Kiriba
Applicant
Peter Kamau Kiriba
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Interlocutory Ruling on Application for Adoption of Surveyor's Report and Execution of Transmission Documents
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should adopt the applicant's proposed subdivision of L.R. No. Ndumberi/Ting’ang’a/1633 as per his surveyor's report.
- 2 Whether the Deputy Registrar should execute transmission documents as prayed by the applicant.
- 3 Whether the title document held by the respondent should be released to the applicant.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the two surveyor's reports and sketch plans submitted by the applicant and respondent were completely at variance, making it impossible to fairly determine the matter based solely on the documents. To ensure a just and equitable resolution of the dispute regarding the subdivision of the property, the court directed that both surveyors appear in court to provide further details, explanations, and, if necessary, be subjected to cross-examination. This approach would enable the court to appreciate the merits of each proposal and make an informed decision on the appropriate subdivision of the property between the parties.
Court Disposition
Application for adoption of applicant's surveyor's report and related prayers deferred pending further hearing.
Orders
- Eng. J. M. Gatome of Gatome & Associates and N. M. Purity of Earthscope Survey Services to appear in court on a date to be agreed for clarification and possible cross-examination regarding their respective reports.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
18 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI
(FAMILY DIVISION)
SUCCESSION CAUSE NO 1568 OF 2009
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF STEPHEN KIRIBA KINORO (DECEASED)
JOHN MUCHIRI KIRIBA........................APPLICANT
R U L I N G
1. Muigai J made a ruling on distribution of the estate on the 30th of June 2016.
Following the said ruling a confirmed grant was issued. The property subject of this ruling being property L.R. No. Ndumberi/Ting’ang’a/1633 was to be shared between three persons. George Ndung’u Kiriba was to get ½ share and the other ½ was to be shared equally between John Muchiri Kiriba and Peter Kamau Kiriba.
2. The two, namely, Peter Kamau Kiriba and John Muchiri Kiriba arising from the ruling have an issue as to which portion of their half each should take hence prayer 4, 5 and 6 of the application of 8th February 2019 by John Muchiri Kiriba seeking to have the court adopt his surveyor’s report; for the Deputy Registrar to execute transmission documents and for release of the title document being held by Peter Kamau Kiriba.
3. John Muchiri’s contestation is that he settled on the upper portion allocated to them for over 20 years, has developed the same and therefore he should be allowed to continue with the portion as demonstrated by his proposed sub-division.
4. On the other hand, Peter Muchiri claims that the area being proposed for him is steep and narrow and therefore unfair to him. He craved of leave of court to file his own proposal on the subdivision. Leave was granted and he duly filed a surveyor’s report.
5. The two survey Reports and sketch plans are completely at variance even in terms of the sketches and in my considered view for the court to appreciate both of them and fairly determine the matter the makers will have to give more details, make explanations and if necessary be subjected to cross examination.
6. Consequently, I hereby direct that Eng. J. M. Gatome of Gatome & Associates and N. M. Purity of Earthscope Survey Services do appear in court on a date to be agreed in regard to their respective reports.
Dated and Delivered in Nairobi on this14TH day of NOVEMBER 2019.
………………
ALI-ARONI
JUDGE