[2019] KEHC 7858 (KLR)
The court found that the petitioner’s proposed distribution was unfair as it disadvantaged some beneficiaries by allocating them only a share in one property while others received additional properties. The absence of property valuations and acreage information made it impossible to ascertain equality in...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEHC 7858 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: John Marangu Stephen; Respondent: Daniel Kaburu Stephen
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Meru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 10 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- Estate to be distributed equally among all beneficiaries; no order as to costs.
- Judges
- A Mabeya
- Legal Topics
- Intestate Succession, Distribution of Estate, Beneficiaries Identification
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Marangu Stephen
Applicant
Daniel Kaburu Stephen
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the estate of the deceased should be distributed equally among all beneficiaries as per Section 38 of the Law of Succession Act.
- 2 Whether the proposals by the petitioner for distribution were fair and in accordance with the law.
- 3 Whether the absence of property valuations affects the ability to achieve equality in distribution.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the petitioner’s proposed distribution was unfair as it disadvantaged some beneficiaries by allocating them only a share in one property while others received additional properties. The absence of property valuations and acreage information made it impossible to ascertain equality in distribution. The court held that, in accordance with Section 38 of the Law of Succession Act, the estate must be distributed equally among all beneficiaries. The court therefore ordered that all properties and shares be distributed equally among the six beneficiaries, either by sharing or by sale and equal division of proceeds.
Court Disposition
Estate to be distributed equally among all beneficiaries; no order as to costs.
Orders
- A grant of letters of administration intestate is issued to Daniel Kaburu Stephen.
- The estate of the deceased is to be distributed equally among Paul Kinyua Stephen, Elias Kimathi M’Amanja, Daniel Kaburu Stephen, Julius Nkamani, John Marangu Stephen, and Esther Ruguru.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
80 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU
SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 10 OF 2018
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF STEPHEN KIRIMI M’AMANJA alias S. KIRIMI M’AMANJA (DECEASED)
JOHN MARANGU STEPHEN....................................APPLICANT/OBJECTOR
VERSUS
DANIEL KABURU STEPHEN..........................PETITIONER/RESPONDENT
J U D G M E N T
1. STEPHEN KIRIMI M’AMANJA alias S. KIRIMI M’AMANJA (‘the deceased’)died on 13th August, 2008. He was survived by his six children namely: Paul Kinyua Stephen, Elias Kimathi M’Amanja, Daniel Kaburu Stephen, Julius Nkamani, John Marangu and Esther Ruguru.
2. The petitioner petitioned for grant of letters of administration intestate which was issued to him on 28th December 2011 and confirmed on 18th December 2012 in the Magistrate’s court at Chuka. The matter was thereafter transferred to this court upon application by John Marangu Stephen (“the objector”).
3. By consent of the parties, the grant was revoked by this court on 4th December 2018 and the parties agreed to file their respective affidavits on the mode of distribution. This they did and they required the court to examine and consider them and make its decision on distribution.
4. In his affidavit sworn on 5th March, 2019, the petitioner proposed that the estate be distributed as follows: -
a) L. R. No. Nkuene/Taita/2056
Elias Kimathi M’Amanja
b) L. R No. Nkuene/Taita/398/160
Julius Nkamani
c) L.R. No. Ngobit Supuko Block 5/132 South Imenti
Daniel Kaburu Stephen
d) L. R. No. Nkuene/Taita/2060
Julius Nkamani & Esther Ruguru (jointly)
e) L. R. No. Nkuene/Kithangari/183
Esther Ruguru, John Marangu Stephen, Paul Kinyua Stephen, Daniel Kaburu Stephen & Julius Nkamani Stephen (Equal Shares)
f) Ncema Building House Shares
Esther Ruguru
g) Co-operative Bank Shares
To be sold and proceeds to be shared equally
h) Catholic Meru Association Small House Shares
Esther Ruguru
5. On his part, the objector proposed in his affidavit sworn on 27th February, 2019 that the estate be distributed equally amongst all the six beneficiaries with the exception of Plot No. Nkuene/Taita 398/160, Ncema Building House shares, Co-operative Bank shares and Catholic Men Association Small House shares which should be sold and the proceeds therefrom be shared equally.
6. This being a family court, its jurisdiction is to ascertain the beneficiaries of the deceased, ensure collection and preservation of the estate property and thereafter distribute the same to the beneficiaries. In Re Estate of Alice Mumbua Mutua (Deceased) [2017] eKLR Musyoka J. held:-
“The Law of Succession Act, and the Rules made thereunder, are designed in such a way that they confer jurisdiction to the probate court with respect to determining the assets of the deceased, the survivors of the deceased and the persons with beneficial interest, and finally distribution of the assets amongst the survivors and the persons beneficially interested. The function of the probate court in the circumstances would be to facilitate collection and preservation of the estate, identification of survivors and beneficiaries, and distribution of the assets.
7. The parties filed their respective affidavits on the mode of distribution but none of them gave any explanation to support his respective contentions. However, the petitioner filed witness statements of Esther Ruguru, Damiano Kinoti M’Arimi, Francis Muriuki Muthauraand his own. Since those were mere statements, they cannot be taken to be evidence. If they were affidavit evidence as the court had directed, the court would have considered the averments thereon in arriving at its decision. They however remain what they are, mere statements of no probative value whatsoever.
8. It is trite law that when a deceased has died intestate and survived by his children, his/her estate ought to be divided equally amongst all the children as is provided for under Section 38 of the Law of Succession Act(“the Act”).
9. There is no dispute of who the beneficiaries of the deceased are. As regards the assets of the deceased, they are known and agreed to by the parties. One thing that is clear from the proposal by the petitioner is that it is not fair. If adopted, the objector and Paul Kinyua Stephenwill be most disadvantaged. This is so because, the two are made to share Nkuene/Kithunguri/183equally with the rest of the beneficiaries who would have already had other properties distributed to them.
10. One other thing which has disturbed this court is that, the petitioner as the administrator of the estate did not bother to file the valuations of the respective properties which would have acted as a guide to this court. Further, there is no evidence as to the size of Nkuene/Kithunguri/183. The total acreage for the other properties is 3. 675 ha. It would be next to impossible for the court to ascertain what will constitute equality in distribution in terms of Section 38 of the Act the absence of known acreages.
11. Accordingly, the order that commends itself to me is that the estate be distributed equally amongst the beneficiaries.
12. In this regard, the court makes the following orders: -
a) a grant of letters of administration intestate is hereby issued to Daniel Kaburu Stephen.
b) the estate of the deceased is hereby distributed as follows:-
L.R. NO. NGOBIT SUPUKO BLOCK 5/132 SOUTH IMENTI
Paul Kinyua Stephen
Elias Kimathi M’Amanja
Daniel Kaburu Stephen To share equally
Julius Nkamani
John Marangu Stephen
Esther Ruguru
PLOT NO. NKUENE/TAITA/398/160
Due to its insignificant size, the property be sold and the proceeds be distributed equally amongst the beneficiaries equally.
NKUENE/KITHUNGURI/183
Paul Kinyua Stephen
Elias Kimathi M’Amanja
Daniel Kaburu Stephen To share equally
Julius Nkamani
John Marangu Stephen
Esther Ruguru
NCEMA BUILDING HOUSE SHARES
Paul Kinyua Stephen
Elias Kimathi M’amanja
Daniel Kaburu Stephen To share equally
Julius Nkamani
John Marangu Stephen
Esther Ruguru
CO-OPERATIVE BANK SHARES
Paul Kinyua Stephen
Elias Kimathi M’amanja
Daniel Kaburu Stephen To share equally
Julius Nkamani
John Marangu Stephen
Esther Ruguru
CATHOLIC MEN ASSOCIATION SMALL HOUSE SHARES
Paul Kinyua Stephen
Elias Kimathi M’Amanja
Daniel Kaburu Stephen To share equally
Julius Nkamani
John Marangu Stephen
Esther Ruguru
12. This being a family matter, I will make no order as to costs.
DATED and DELIVERED at Meru this 25th day of April, 2019.
A. MABEYA
JUDGE