[2018] KEHC 570 (KLR)
The court found the applicant's explanation for non-compliance and non-attendance on 6 September 2018 plausible, particularly as the notice of hearing was received late. Exercising its discretion under Section 47 of the Law of Succession Act and Rule 73 of the Probate and Administration Rules, the court determined...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEHC 570 (KLR)
- Parties
- Respondent: Tabarno Kilach (Deceased); Applicant: Petitioner/Applicant (Name not stated)
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Eldoret
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Probate & Administration 365 of 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Probate and Administration Cause / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Revocation of Grant
- Outcome
- Application allowed; revocation order set aside; cause and grant reinstated.
- Judges
- OA Sewe
- Legal Topics
- Succession, Grant of Letters of Administration, Revocation of Grant, Confirmation of Grant
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tabarno Kilach (Deceased)
Respondent
Petitioner/Applicant (Name not stated)
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Probate and Administration Cause / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Revocation of Grant
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the order revoking the grant of letters of administration should be set aside.
- 2 Whether the succession cause and grant should be reinstated despite the applicant's non-compliance and non-attendance.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found the applicant's explanation for non-compliance and non-attendance on 6 September 2018 plausible, particularly as the notice of hearing was received late. Exercising its discretion under Section 47 of the Law of Succession Act and Rule 73 of the Probate and Administration Rules, the court determined that the ends of justice would be served by setting aside the order revoking the grant, reinstating the succession cause, and allowing the applicant a further opportunity to apply for confirmation of the grant within a specified period. The court emphasized the importance of procedural fairness and the applicant's commitment to proceed expeditiously.
Court Disposition
Application allowed; revocation order set aside; cause and grant reinstated.
Orders
- The orders issued on 6 September 2018 revoking the grant are set aside.
- The succession cause is reinstated as prayed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
18 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT ELDORET
P&A CAUSE NO. 365 OF 2012
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF TABARNO KILACH (DECEASED)
RULING
[1]The application dated 2 October 2018 was filed herein by the Petitioner/Applicant pursuant to Article 159 of the Constitution, Section 45 and 47 of the Law of Succession Act, Chapter 160 Laws of Kenya, and Rule 73 of the Probate and Administration Rules for the review and setting aside of the Order dated 6 September 2018 by which the Petitioner's grant was revoked. The Petitioner also prayed that the Court be pleased to reinstate the Petition and the Grant of Letters of Administration Intestate issued on 9 July 2013 and order for the expeditious filing of Summons for Confirmation of the Grant.
[2] The application was premised on the grounds that the Petitioner did not receive the Notice dated 9 August 2018, which was sent by post until 28 September 2018, almost one month later. It was further the contention of the Petitioner that he was not aware that he was required to take steps in the matter after the issuance of Grant of Letters of Administration and made a commitment to move with due dispatch if granted the opportunity.
[3] This cause was filed on 2 November 2012 and a Grant of Letters of Administration Intestate was thereafter issued on 9 July 2013 to the Petitioner. That Grant was therefore due for confirmation in any time after 10 January 2014. No action was taken by the Petitioner in that regard. Accordingly, on the 9 August 2018, notice was issued to the Petitioner requiring him to apply forthwith for confirmation of the Grant, failing which the Grant would be revoked; for which reason the date of 6 September 2018 was appointed for the Petitioner's attendance. The record of 6 September 2018 shows that, due to non-compliance by the Petitioner, the Grant was revoked and the cause dismissed for want of prosecution.
[4] The Court does have powers, under Section 47 of the Law of Succession Act and Rule 73 of the Probate and Administration Rules to make such orders as would meet the ends of justice in such matters. The explanation offered by the Petitioner for his non-compliance and non-attendance on 6 September 2018 is plausible. Accordingly, I would allow his application and grant orders as hereunder:
[a] That the orders issued herein on 6 September 2018 be and are hereby set aside;
[b] That this Succession Cause be and is hereby reinstated as prayed;
[c] That an application for Confirmation of Grant be filed forthwith, at any rate not later than 14 days from the date hereof;
[d] That the costs of the application be costs in the cause.
Orders accordingly.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT ELDORET THIS 20TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2018
OLGA SEWE
JUDGE