[2018] KEHC 3703 (KLR)
The court found that L.R. Ngobit/Supuko Block 5/86 and L.R. Abogeta/L.Kithangari/263 did not form part of the deceased's estate as there was insufficient evidence to prove they belonged to the deceased at the time of his death. The court adopted the distribution proposals where there was consensus between the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEHC 3703 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Catherine Kaimuri Karimba; Respondent: Beatrice Mucece
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Meru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 508 of 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Confirmation of Grant and Distribution of Estate
- Outcome
- Grant of letters of administration confirmed and estate distributed as per court's orders.
- Legal Topics
- Intestate Succession, Distribution of Estate, Administration of Estates, Trusteeship of Beneficiaries
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Catherine Kaimuri Karimba
Applicant
Beatrice Mucece
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Confirmation of Grant and Distribution of Estate
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether L.R. Ngobit/Supuko Block 5/86 and L.R. Abogeta/L.Kithangari/263 form part of the deceased's estate for distribution.
- 2 What is the fair and just mode of distribution of the remaining estate properties among the beneficiaries.
- 3 How should shares and other movable assets be devolved among the next of kin.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that L.R. Ngobit/Supuko Block 5/86 and L.R. Abogeta/L.Kithangari/263 did not form part of the deceased's estate as there was insufficient evidence to prove they belonged to the deceased at the time of his death. The court adopted the distribution proposals where there was consensus between the parties and, where there was variance, preferred the proposal that ensured equitable distribution among the houses and beneficiaries. The court ordered that the remaining estate properties be distributed as per the detailed schedule, with certain shares held in trust for the benefit of children in each house. Shares and other movable assets were to devolve to the next of kin as...
Court Disposition
Grant of letters of administration confirmed and estate distributed as per court's orders.
Orders
- L.R. Ngobit/Supuko Block 5/86 and L.R. Abogeta/L.Kithangari/263 excluded from the estate.
- L.R. Abogeta/L.Kithangari/221 to be divided into four equal shares, each held in trust for the respective house's beneficiaries.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
74 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT KENYA
AT MERU
SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 508 OF 2009
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF THE LATE EDWARD M M’ARIMBA
M’INOTI alias ARIMBA INOTI alias M’ARIMBA M’INOTI - DECEASED
CATHERINE KAIMURI KARIMBA...........PETITIONER
VS
BEATRICE MUCECE........................................OBJECTOR
RULING
Edward M’Arimba M’Inoti died intestate on 7th January 1991 and according to was survived by three widows, 6 sons and 5 daughters, 3 of his sons died before him and their names have also been given in P & A5.
The chief of Kathangari Location wrote a letter dated 3rd December 2008 identifying the survivors and the properties forming the estate. He gave names of the 3 widows as the administrators.
When the other 2 widows failed to take action to petition for Letters of Administration Catherine Kaemuri cited them. On 11. 4.2013 Catherine Kaimuri and Beatrice Mucece were made Joint Administratrix of the estate. Application for confirmation was made dated 7th October 2014. It was supported with affidavit of Catherine Kaimuri Karumba who gave proposal as to distribution in paragraph 5. Beatrice Mucece also filed her affidavit with mode of distribution in affidavit sworn and filed on 21. 12. 2015.
In a further affidavit sworn by Beatrice Mucece on 26th August 2015 she said that L.R. Ngobit/Supuko Block 5/86 does not form part of the estate as it is registered in her name. Catherine Kaimuri in a further affidavit in response to objectors affidavit dated 26. 8.2015 swore an affidavit on 26th August 2015 and averred that Beatrice Mucece transferred L.R. No. Ngobit/Supuko Block 5/86 after the death of the deceased into her name. She said the parcel at Ngobit was bought through deceased persons shares in South Imenti Investment Co. Ltd. She said the Objector didn’t acquire the land on her own and had not shown evidence of acquisition. She said the objector had also transferred L.R. No. Abogeta/L.Kithangari/263 which they had allowed her to keep.
Inconsideration that the Land Registrar Laikipia has confirmed that L.R. No. Ngobit/Supuko Block 5/86 was transferred to Beatrice Mucece from the Government of Kenya and there is nothing to show expressly that the property belonged to the deceased, this court shall exclude it from the list of assets forming the intestate estate herein.
The green card for L.R. Aboget/L.Kithangari/263 shows that M.thuura Kajogi was 1st Registered appropriator on 7th October 1988 and on 4. 10. 1995 the same was transferred to Beatrice Mucece. The deceased herein is M’Arimba M’Inoti and not M’Thuura Kajogi from whom transfer to Beatrice Mucece was made. This property will also be excluded from list of assets in the estate. What remains for distribution is:-
L.R. Abogeta/L.Kithangari/221 – measuring 3. 28 Ha which according to Beatrice Mucece should be distributed as follows:-
i. Catherine Kaimuri – 2. 20 acres
ii. Ashford Muthomi
Rosemary Gacheru 2. 29 acres to share equally.
Nancy Kawira
Alex Gitonga
iii. Beatrice Mucece to hold in trust?
iv. Boniface Mwenda Muthuri Markdonald Mutwiri, Risper Kagwiria – to get 1. 23 acres to share equally.
(1) On the other hand Catherine proposes that L.R. Abogeta/L.Kithangari/221 be shared as follows:-
i. Catherine Kaimuri – ¼ share
ii. Ashford Muthomi – ¼ share to hold in Trust for
Rosemary Gacheri
Nancy Kawira
Alex Murithi
iii. Muthuri Boniface Mwenda to hold ¼ share for himself and Markdonald Mutwiri and Risper Kagwiria in equal shares.
iv Beatrice Mucece – ¼ share
(2) For L.R. No. Abogeta/L.Kithangari/199 – the proposal for distribution for by Catherine Kaimuri as follows:-
Muthuri Boniface
Markdonald Mutwiri To share equally
Risper Kagwiria
Proposal by Beatrice Mucece in respect to L.R. Abogeta/L.Kithangari/199 is similar to that of Catherine Kaimuri and the court will devolve this particular land as proposed.
(3) For L.R Abogeta/Nkachie/666 –measuring 4. 05 Ha Catherine proposes distribution as follows:-
To be shared between two houses
i. Morris Mutemba Kirimi and Doreen Kawira to share half of the land equally.
ii. Muthuri Boniface Mwenda, Markdonald Mutwiri and Risper Kagwiria to share half of the land.
Beatrice Mucece proposes that L.R. Abogeta/Nkachie/666 be shared equally among the four houses.
(4) L.R.Abogeta/Lower Kiungone/514/63 – Measuring 0. 0149 acres is proposed by Catherine Kaimuri as follows:-
½ share to 4th House for Beatrice Mucece and ½ share to be held by Ashford Muthomi in trust for the Children in 2nd House to share equally. Beatrice Muceces proposal agrees with that of Catherine in respect to this property and it shall be allowed as such.
(5) Plot No. 15 A – Kanyakine Market is proposed by Catherine Kaimuri to be shared equally by Catherine Kaimuri, Muthuri Boniface and Douglas Karimba. There is no objection by Beatrice Mucece to this proposal and she has not made any proposal to manner. Catherine Kaimuri has distributed the plot.
(6) Catherine also proposed that all shares be registered in her name. She said this was a decision made in a family meeting on 12th July 2014. Beatrice Mucece on the other hand she proposed that the shares be distributed equally among the 4 houses. Submissions were made in respect to the mode of distributions by counsels for Catherine Kaimuri and Beatrice Mucece.
i. There being consensus as to distribution of L.R.Abogeta/L.Kithangari/199 the same will be distributed as follows:-
Muthuri Boniface
Markdonald Mutwiri To share equally.
Risper Kagwiria
ii. Beatrice Mucece and Catherine Kaimuri are in agreement that L.R. Abogeta/L. Kiungone/514/63 be shared between the 4th house and the 2nd house. i.e Ashford Muthomi to hold in trust half of the land for himself and his siblings in equal shares and Beatrice to hold half share in trust for herself and her children in equal shares.
iii. It is also not disputed that plot no. 15A at Kanyakine market should be shared equally by Catherine Kaimuri, Mutwiri Boniface and Douglas Kaimba.
That proposal will therefore be adopted by the court.
For the parcel of Land No. Abogeta/L.Kithangari/221 although there is variance as to distribution I do think the most fair and just proposal is that of Catherine Kaimuri that she gets ¼ share of the land for her house but the rider should be that she holds it for herself and her children with the deceased in equal shares.
Ashford Muthomi is also to hold ¼ share in trust for himself and Rosemary Gacheri, Nancy Kawira and Alex Murithi in equal shares. Muthuri Boniface Mwenda will hold ¼ share in trust for himself and Markdonald and Mutwiri and Risper Kagwiria in equal shares and lastly Beatrice Mucece will also hold ¼ share in trust of herself and her children in equal shares.
L.R. Abogeta/Nkachie/666 – measuring 4. 05 Hectares should be distributed as proposed by Catherine Kaimuri as follows:-
Muthuri Boniface Mwenda
Markdonald Mutwiri ½ to share equally
Risper Kagwiria
That is 2. 025 Ha to share equally.
Morris Mutembei ½ of the land to share equally i.e 2. 025 ha
Doreen Kauria
Concerning the shares the same should devolve to the next of kin as indicated in the documents/certificates of shares at the different institutions where the deceased had the shares and/or bank accounts. In event there is no next of kin indicated then the surviving wives of the deceased should have equally.
The costs of the cause shall be defrayed from the estate of the deceased by the 2 widows from assets that can be disposed off easily.
Ruling Signed, Delivered and Dated 2nd Day of August 2018.
HON. A.ONG’INJO
JUDGE
In the presence of:
M/S Gikunda Anampiu Advocate for petitioner – N/A
Mr Murithi Advocate for Protester
Petitioner:- Present in person
Protester: Present in person
HON. A.ONG’INJO
JUDGE