[2024] KEHC 7434 (KLR)

[2024] KEHC 7434 (KLR)

The court determined that, given the complexity of the relationships between the parties, the degree of consanguinity, and the significant passage of time since the grant was issued and confirmed, the applications to annul the grant cannot be justly resolved on affidavit evidence alone. Oral evidence is necessary to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEHC 7434 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Philip Kibe Mbugua; Respondent: Rose Wanjiru Kibe; Respondent: Nancy Nyokabi Kibe
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 1366 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Directions
Outcome
Directions issued for oral hearing of applications to annul grant.
Judges
HK Chemitei
Legal Topics
Annulment of Grant, Oral Evidence, Succession Procedure
Source Language
en
Family and Children Annulment of Grant Oral Evidence Succession Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Philip Kibe Mbugua

Applicant

Rose Wanjiru Kibe

Respondent

Nancy Nyokabi Kibe

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Directions

  1. 1 Whether the applications to annul the grant should be determined on affidavit evidence or by viva voce (oral) evidence.
  2. 2 Whether the passage of time and the relationships between the parties necessitate oral testimony.

Ratio Decidendi

The court determined that, given the complexity of the relationships between the parties, the degree of consanguinity, and the significant passage of time since the grant was issued and confirmed, the applications to annul the grant cannot be justly resolved on affidavit evidence alone. Oral evidence is necessary to clarify contested facts and ensure a fair hearing. Therefore, the applications will be determined by way of viva voce evidence, with the applicants designated as plaintiffs and the respondents as defendants. The parties are granted time to file further affidavits or statements if needed, and the matter is to be set for hearing on a priority basis.

Court Disposition

Directions issued for oral hearing of applications to annul grant.

Orders

  • The two applications dated 22nd September 2023 and 25th September 2023 shall be determined by way of oral evidence.
  • Applicants shall be plaintiffs and respondents shall be defendants.