[2018] KEELC 3655 (KLR)

[2018] KEELC 3655 (KLR)

The court found that the defendant, as administrator of the deceased's estate, held the original agreements not in her own right but in a representative capacity. Since she was not a party signatory to the documents and did not deny possession of the originals, and a proper basis for secondary evidence had been...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELC 3655 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Florence Nasambu Khaemba; Plaintiff: Elizabeth Chemakal Jackson; Defendant: Selina Chelimo Jackson
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Kitale
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Land Case 148 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Land Case / Ruling on Admissibility of Documentary Evidence
Outcome
Objection overruled; copies of agreements admitted as evidence; hearing to proceed.
Judges
FM Njoroge
Legal Topics
Admissibility of Evidence, Production of Documents, Estate Administration
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Admissibility of Evidence Production of Documents Estate Administration

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Florence Nasambu Khaemba

Plaintiff

Elizabeth Chemakal Jackson

Plaintiff

Selina Chelimo Jackson

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Land Case / Ruling on Admissibility of Documentary Evidence

  1. 1 Whether copies of agreements can be admitted as evidence when the originals are held by the defendant as administrator of the deceased's estate.
  2. 2 Whether the absence of a notice to produce originals precludes the admission of copies.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the defendant, as administrator of the deceased's estate, held the original agreements not in her own right but in a representative capacity. Since she was not a party signatory to the documents and did not deny possession of the originals, and a proper basis for secondary evidence had been established, the court held that it was proper to admit the copies of the agreements as evidence. The objection to their admissibility was therefore overruled.

Court Disposition

Objection overruled; copies of agreements admitted as evidence; hearing to proceed.

Orders

  • Copies of the agreements dated 1/9/1998, 4/11/1998, and 31/8/1998 are admitted as P. Exhibit 2, P. Exhibit 3, and P. Exhibit 4 respectively.
  • Objection to admissibility of copies is overruled.