[2023] KEHC 18294 (KLR)
The court found that the proposal advanced by the petitioners, which was supported by the majority of beneficiaries and based on the partial mediation settlement agreement, was fair and in accordance with the Law of Succession Act. The court noted that the objector's proposal failed to consider the differences in...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEHC 18294 (KLR)
- Parties
- Objector: Kenneth Cheruiyot; Petitioner: Hellen Chepngeno Laboso; Petitioner: Wesley Kiplangat Kirui
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kericho
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 161 of 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- Objection dismissed; partial mediation settlement adopted; grant confirmed and rectified; estate distributed as per settlement; each party to bear own costs.
- Judges
- JK Sergon
- Legal Topics
- Distribution of Estate, Confirmation of Grant, Rectification of Grant, Beneficiary Entitlements, Mediation Settlement, Land Subdivision
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kenneth Cheruiyot
Objector
Hellen Chepngeno Laboso
Petitioner
Wesley Kiplangat Kirui
Petitioner
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proposed mode of distribution of the deceased's estate, particularly the two disputed parcels of land, is fair and in accordance with the Law of Succession Act.
- 2 Whether the objection by Kenneth Cheruiyot regarding the distribution of the two parcels should be upheld or dismissed.
- 3 Whether the partial mediation settlement agreement should be adopted as the court's decision.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the proposal advanced by the petitioners, which was supported by the majority of beneficiaries and based on the partial mediation settlement agreement, was fair and in accordance with the Law of Succession Act. The court noted that the objector's proposal failed to consider the differences in fertility and arability between the two parcels of land, rendering it unreasonable and unfair. The court therefore adopted the mediation settlement as its decision, ordered the subdivision of the parcels as proposed, and allowed the summons for confirmation and rectification of grant. The court further provided detailed directions on the implementation of the distribution,...
Court Disposition
Objection dismissed; partial mediation settlement adopted; grant confirmed and rectified; estate distributed as per settlement; each party to bear own costs.
Orders
- The partial mediation settlement agreement dated 6/1/2023 is adopted as the decision of the court.
- Subdivision to be done so that each beneficiary receives 3 acres of land.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
51 paragraphs
In re Estate of the Late John Kipkemoi Laboso (Deceased) (Succession Cause 161 of 2008) [2023] KEHC 18294 (KLR) (30 May 2023) (Judgment)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 18294 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Kericho
Succession Cause 161 of 2008
JK Sergon, J
May 30, 2023
Between
Kenneth Cheruiyot
Objector
and
Hellen Chepngeno Laboso
1st Petitioner
Wesley Kiplangat Kirui
2nd Petitioner
Judgment
1. The subject matter of this Confirmation of Grant dated July 23, 2010 and the summons for Rectification of Grant dated 2011 – plus the Objection taken out by Kenneth Cheruiyot. The main issue which arose for determination is the distribution of the Estate of John Kipkemoi Laboso, deceased.
2. The dispute was referred to court Annexed Mediation which process returned a partial Settlement Agreement dated January 6, 2023. What was left undetermined by the court Annexed Mediation is the distribution of two parcels of Land Namely:i.L.R No. Kericho/Kimulot/304 andii.LR. No. Kericho/Londiani/Kedowa/Block.2 (Tegunot).
3. The hearing on the dispute over the distribution of the aforesaid parcels of Land proceeded before this court. The following beneficiaries Namely:- Wesley Kiplangat Kirui, Hellen Chepngeno laboso, Elvis Kipyegon Kirui, Ronny Kipkorir Kirui and Victor Kirui appeared and testified in support of the mode of distribution proposed by Wesley Kiplangat Kirui (PW.1).
4. The objector namely Kenneth Cheruiyot did not attend court for hearing despite having been served with a hearing notice by the petitioners. The Succession Cause therefore proceeded for hearing without the objector’s participation though the court is bound to consider his written proposal on the distribution of the aforesaid two parcels.
5. The first to take the witness stand is the 2nd petitioner Wesley Kiplangat Kirui (PW.1, who urged this court to adopt the partial Mediation Settlement Agreement dated January 6, 2023. PW.1 told this court that the two parcels of land i.e. L.R. No. Kericho/Kimulot/304 and L.R. No. Kericho/Londiani/Kedowa Block 2 (Tegunot) were not similar in fertility and arability and therefore he proposed for the two parcels to be distributed equally between all the beneficiaries.
6. PW.1 proposed that the beneficiaries namely:- Kenneth Cheruiyot and Emmanuel Kibet Cheruiyot (representing the Estate of Charles Cheruiyot Kirui, Deceased)
Wesley Kiplangat Kirui
Hellen Chepngeno Laboso
Elvis Kipyegon Kirui
Betsy Cherono Laboso
Collins Kipngetich Kirui
Ronny Kipkorir Kirui
Victor Kipkoech Kirui
Judy Chemutai Laboso
Should each get two (2) Acres from L.R. No.Kericho/Londiani/Kedowa/Block 2 (Tegunot)
7. PW.1 also proposed that the following beneficiaries(i)Kenneth Cheruiyot and Emmanuel Kibet Cheruiyot (representing the Estate of Charles Cheruiyot Kirui, Deceased)(ii)Wesley Kiplangat Kiruiiii.Hellen Chepngeno Labosoiv.Elvis Kipyegon Kiruiv.Betsy Cherono Laboso andvi.Collins Kipngetich KiruiShould each get one (1) acre to be excised from L.R. Kericho/Kimulot/304.
8. PW.1 opposed the proposal by Kenneth Cheruiyot claiming that the same is untenable because those parcels of land are not all arable not fertile in equal measure.
9. The other witnesses who testified namely:-(i)Hellen Chepngeno Laboso (PW.2),(ii)Elvis Kipyegon Kirui (PW.3)(iii)Ronny Kiprotich Kirui (PW.4) and(iv)Victor Kipkoech Kirui (PW.5). all adopted the evidence and proposal of PW.1. They all urged this Court to dismiss the proposal by Kenneth Cheruiyot.
10. Having considered the evidence tendered by PW.1, PW.2, PW.3, PW.4 and PW.5, I am convinced that their proposed mode of distribution is fair and is in accordance with the Law of succession Act. I find the proposal by Kenneth Cheruiyot to be unreasonable and unfair because the proposal does not take into account the fertility and arability of each parcel.
11. In the end, this court makes the following orders:-(i)The partial mediation settlement agreement dated 6/1/2023 is adopted as the decision of this Court.a.That the sub-division be done whereby each beneficiary will get 3 Acres of land.b.That sub-divisions will be done horizontally in the case of Kimulot – 304 piece of land.c.That they will make a new road to be used by all the beneficiaries.d.That the other nine beneficiaries will plant new seedlings on the empty land belonging to the objector (Kenneth Cheruiyot) including any such empty land without tea.e.That the Objector (Kenneth Cheruiyot) will be plucking tea assigned to him at the moment until the expiry of seven years after that the Objector will move to the new Tea Plantation in exchange.f.That the empty land for the Objector will be measured to determine the size given to him from the old Tea Plantation to be plucking.g.That the commencement of planting the new Tea starts on April 1, 2023. (ii)The Summons for Confirmation of Grant and Summons for rectification of Grant are allowed and distribution be done as proposed in the partial mediation settlement dated 6/1/2023. (iii)The two parcels of land be distributed as follows:-a.L.R. No. Kericho/Kimulot/304:- The following beneficiaries to each have one Acre to be excised from the aforesaid parcel:- Kenneth Cheruiyotand Emmanuel Kibet Cheruiyot (Representing the Estate of Charles Cheruiyot Kirui, deceased),
Wesley Kiplangat Kirui,
Hellen Chepngeno Laboso,
Elvis Kipyegon Kirui,
Betzy Cherono and
Collins Kipngetich Kiruib.L.R. Kericho/Londiani/Kedowa/Block 2 (Tegunot): The following beneficiaries to each have 2 Acres to be excised from the aforesaid Parcel:- Kenneth Cheruiyot & Emmanuel Kibet Cheruiyot (representing the Estate of Charles Cheruiyot Kirui, deceased)
Wesley Kiplangat Kirui
Hellen Chepngeno Laboso,
Elvis Kipyegon Kirui,
Betzy Cherono Laboso,
Collins Kipngetich Kirui,
Ronny Kipkorir Kirui,
Judy Chemutai Laboso,
Dennis Kimutai Laboso and
Victor Kipkoech Kirui.(iv)Each party to meet its own costs.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT KERICHO THIS 30TH DAY OF MAY, 2023. J.K. SERGONJUDGEIn the presence of:C/Assistant - RutohWesley Kiplangat Kirui – Present in PersonHellen Chepngeno Laboso – Present in PersonNo Appearance for the other beneficiaries