[2023] KEHC 18294 (KLR)

[2023] KEHC 18294 (KLR)

The court found that the proposal advanced by the petitioners, which was supported by the majority of beneficiaries and based on the partial mediation settlement agreement, was fair and in accordance with the Law of Succession Act. The court noted that the objector's proposal failed to consider the differences in...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEHC 18294 (KLR)
Parties
Objector: Kenneth Cheruiyot; Petitioner: Hellen Chepngeno Laboso; Petitioner: Wesley Kiplangat Kirui
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kericho
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 161 of 2008
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Judgment
Outcome
Objection dismissed; partial mediation settlement adopted; grant confirmed and rectified; estate distributed as per settlement; each party to bear own costs.
Judges
JK Sergon
Legal Topics
Distribution of Estate, Confirmation of Grant, Rectification of Grant, Beneficiary Entitlements, Mediation Settlement, Land Subdivision
Source Language
en
Family and Children Land and Property Distribution of Estate Confirmation of Grant Rectification of Grant Beneficiary Entitlements Mediation Settlement Land Subdivision

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kenneth Cheruiyot

Objector

Hellen Chepngeno Laboso

Petitioner

Wesley Kiplangat Kirui

Petitioner

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the proposed mode of distribution of the deceased's estate, particularly the two disputed parcels of land, is fair and in accordance with the Law of Succession Act.
  2. 2 Whether the objection by Kenneth Cheruiyot regarding the distribution of the two parcels should be upheld or dismissed.
  3. 3 Whether the partial mediation settlement agreement should be adopted as the court's decision.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the proposal advanced by the petitioners, which was supported by the majority of beneficiaries and based on the partial mediation settlement agreement, was fair and in accordance with the Law of Succession Act. The court noted that the objector's proposal failed to consider the differences in fertility and arability between the two parcels of land, rendering it unreasonable and unfair. The court therefore adopted the mediation settlement as its decision, ordered the subdivision of the parcels as proposed, and allowed the summons for confirmation and rectification of grant. The court further provided detailed directions on the implementation of the distribution,...

Court Disposition

Objection dismissed; partial mediation settlement adopted; grant confirmed and rectified; estate distributed as per settlement; each party to bear own costs.

Orders

  • The partial mediation settlement agreement dated 6/1/2023 is adopted as the decision of the court.
  • Subdivision to be done so that each beneficiary receives 3 acres of land.