[2024] KEHC 9965 (KLR)

[2024] KEHC 9965 (KLR)

The court found that the consent recorded by the beneficiaries, save for Janet Kanini Weru, was valid and that Janet's share in the estate was preserved despite her opting out of the proceedings. The absence of her endorsement did not prejudice her entitlement, as the schedule of distribution accounted for her...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEHC 9965 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Happy Koki Wambua; Applicant: Mary Waeni Wambua; Respondent: Janet Kanini Weru
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 2557 of 2012
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Judgment
Outcome
Application allowed; grant confirmed as per the consent and attached schedule.
Judges
HK Chemitei
Legal Topics
Confirmation of Grant, Distribution of Estate, Consent Orders
Source Language
en
Family and Children Confirmation of Grant Distribution of Estate Consent Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Happy Koki Wambua

Applicant

Mary Waeni Wambua

Applicant

Janet Kanini Weru

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the grant issued on 28th March 2017 should be confirmed in light of the consent recorded by the beneficiaries.
  2. 2 Whether the absence of endorsement by one beneficiary (Janet Kanini Weru) invalidates the consent or prejudices her share in the estate.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the consent recorded by the beneficiaries, save for Janet Kanini Weru, was valid and that Janet's share in the estate was preserved despite her opting out of the proceedings. The absence of her endorsement did not prejudice her entitlement, as the schedule of distribution accounted for her share. The court emphasized the need to bring the matter to a close given the protracted litigation and the fact that no beneficiary was left out. Accordingly, the grant was confirmed as per the consent and attached schedule, with the right of Janet to deal with her share as she wishes upon execution of the grant.

Court Disposition

Application allowed; grant confirmed as per the consent and attached schedule.

Orders

  • The application dated 8th May 2018 is allowed in terms of prayer seven (7).
  • The grant issued on 28th March 2017 is confirmed as per the schedule attached to the consent dated 31st May 2024 and filed on 19th June 2024.