[2025] KEHC 7083 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant, as the administrator de bonis non, had properly moved the court for rectification of the confirmed grant to enable completion of the administration of the estate. The application was supported by the consent of all beneficiaries, and there was no objection. The court held that...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] KEHC 7083 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Mirriam Njeri Kimani; Respondent: Margaret Waruguru Kimani (deceased)
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nakuru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 212 of 1982
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Rectification of Grant
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Judges
- SM Mohochi
- Legal Topics
- Rectification of Grant, Letters of Administration, Distribution of Estate, Consent of Beneficiaries
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mirriam Njeri Kimani
Applicant
Margaret Waruguru Kimani (deceased)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Rectification of Grant
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should rectify the confirmed grant to amend the distribution of 8 acres from plot No. 116 Bahati Scheme to the listed beneficiaries.
- 2 Whether the application meets the legal requirements for rectification under Section 74 of the Law of Succession Act and Rule 43(1) of the Probate and Administration Rules.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant, as the administrator de bonis non, had properly moved the court for rectification of the confirmed grant to enable completion of the administration of the estate. The application was supported by the consent of all beneficiaries, and there was no objection. The court held that Section 74 of the Law of Succession Act and Rule 43(1) of the Probate and Administration Rules provide the legal basis for rectification of grants to correct errors or update the list of beneficiaries. Given that the original administrator had died and the estate had not been fully distributed, it was necessary and just to allow the rectification to facilitate the final...
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- The confirmed grant is rectified to amend the distribution of 8 acres from plot No. 116 Bahati Scheme to the listed beneficiaries: Stanely Kimani Kagimbi, Miriam Njeri Kimani, Lucy Wanjiru Kimani, Grace Njeri Kimani, Serah Wamwagu Kimani, Ann Wambui Kimani, and Teresiah Wanjiku Kimani.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
25 paragraphs
In re Estate of the Late Kimani Runyori (Deceased) (Succession Cause 212 of 1982) [2025] KEHC 7083 (KLR) (22 May 2025) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 7083 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Nakuru
Succession Cause 212 of 1982
SM Mohochi, J
May 22, 2025
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF THE LATE KIMANI RUNYORI (DECEASED)
In the matter of
Mirriam Njeri Kimani
Applicant
Ruling
1. By Summons for Rectification Grant dated 12th July, 2024 brought under Sections 47 and 74 of the Law of Succession Act and Rules 43 of the Probate and Administration Rules. The Applicant seeks:i.Spentii.That this Honourable Court be pleased to amend and or rectify the letters of administration granted to Margaret Waruguru Kimani (deceased) on 6th October, 1993 and confirmed on 18th January, 1995 by:-Amending and or rectifying the heir of 8 acres to be exercised from plot No. 116 Bahati Scheme from Margaret Waruguru Kimani (Deceased) to:Stanely Kimani Kagimbi GrandsonMiriam Njeri Kimani DaughterLucy Wanjiru Kimani DaughterGrace Njeri Kimani DaughterSerah Wamwagu Kimani DaughterAnn Wambui Kimani DaughterTeresiah Wanjiku Kimani Daughter
2. The Application was premised on the grounds on the face of it and the Supporting Affidavit of Miriam Njeri Kimani of even date. It was deponed that she is the daughter of the late Margaret Waruguru Kimani who died on 20th March, 2007.
3. That Letters of Administration were issued to Margaret Waruguru Kimani on 6th October, 1993 and confirmed on 18th day January, 1995. That all the beneficiaries have consented to the rectification.
Analysis and Determination 4. I have considered the Application the grounds thereto and the applicable law. The primary issue is whether the application meets the test of time.
5. The brief facts of this Cause are that the deceased herein Kimani Runyori died intestate on the 30th of June, 1992. The Grant of Letters of administration were issued to his widow Margaret Waruguru Kimani on 6th October, 1993 and confirmed on 18th day January, 1995. The said Administrator passed away on the 20th of March 2007 having not fully completed the Administration.
6. The deceased administrator was substituted by a limited Grant and a fresh grant of letters of administration de bonis non was issued to the Applicant Miriam Njeri Kimani the daughter of the deceased herein and the deceased administrator by this Court on 9th of May, 2024.
7. In re Estate of Harjit Singh Brah alias Harjit Singh Nihal (Deceased [2023] KEHC 25531 (KLR) the Court stated that :-“It is worth noting that there is no specific provision in the Law of Succession Act which provides for substitution of a single deceased administrator/executor or deceased administrators or executors. In case of such a scenario, Section 76 (e) comes into play and a fresh grant of letters of administration de bonis non is sought and issued.”
8. The Applicant herein is seeking to rectify the Confirmed Grant for the 8 acres to be exercised from plot No. 116 Bahati Scheme and distributed to the children pf the deceased so as to complete the administration of the estate.
9. The mode proposed by the Applicant has been consented by the beneficiaries named in the Chief’s letter dated 13th June, 2023 as per the annexed consent to rectification and amendment of grant dated 12th July, 2024.
10. The Applicable law in rectification of Grants is Section 74 of the Law of Succession Act and Rule 43 (1) of the Probate and Administration Rules. Section 74 grants the Court power alteration or amendment errors in names and descriptions or in setting out the time and place of the deceased’s death, or the purpose in a limited grant. Rule 43(1) provides for the procedure to move the Court.
11. There has been no objection to the grant being rectified to include the listed beneficiaries of the estate now that the widow of the deceased is also deceased.
12. From the foregoing, it is only prudent and reasonable therefore that the Court allows the Application in order to complete the distribution process of the estate which has been pending for over 30 years.It is ordered.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT NAKURU ON THIS 22ND DAY OF MAY 2025MOHOCHI S. M.JUDGE