[2025] KEHC 10208 (KLR)

[2025] KEHC 10208 (KLR)

The court found that it has the statutory jurisdiction under section 74 of the Law of Succession Act and Rule 43(1) of the Probate and Administration Rules to rectify errors in the certificate of confirmation of grant, specifically where such errors relate to the names and descriptions of beneficiaries or the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KEHC 10208 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Esther Jerotich Kiprono; Applicant: Samwel Kiptoo; Applicant: Jackson Kipkosgei Kiplagat; Respondent: Paulina Cheptarus Kiplagat
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Eldoret
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 33 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application to Amend Certificate of Confirmation of Grant
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
RN Nyakundi
Legal Topics
Rectification of Grants, Distribution of Estate, Beneficiary Identification, Probate Procedure
Source Language
en
Family and Children Civil Procedure Rectification of Grants Distribution of Estate Beneficiary Identification Probate Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Esther Jerotich Kiprono

Applicant

Samwel Kiptoo

Applicant

Jackson Kipkosgei Kiplagat

Applicant

Paulina Cheptarus Kiplagat

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Application to Amend Certificate of Confirmation of Grant

  1. 1 Whether the amended certificate of confirmation of grant should be further amended to correct errors in names and apportionment of land among beneficiaries.
  2. 2 Whether the court has jurisdiction to rectify errors in the certificate of confirmation of grant under section 74 of the Law of Succession Act and Rule 43 of the Probate and Administration Rules.
  3. 3 Whether the proposed amendments would prejudice any party or affect the substantive distribution of the estate.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that it has the statutory jurisdiction under section 74 of the Law of Succession Act and Rule 43(1) of the Probate and Administration Rules to rectify errors in the certificate of confirmation of grant, specifically where such errors relate to the names and descriptions of beneficiaries or the apportionment of shares. The evidence demonstrated that the amended certificate of confirmation of grant dated 9/5/2025 contained manifest errors in the names of certain beneficiaries and in the allocation of land. The court determined that rectifying these errors would not prejudice any party and was necessary to facilitate the proper and just distribution of the estate. The court...

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • The amended certificate of confirmation of grant dated 9/5/2025 shall be further amended to reduce the land apportioned to Mathew Kipkosgei Mutung (number XXXI) in Kipsinende/Kipsinende Block 1(Chepkero)/20 from 1.67 acres to 1.11 acres.
  • The 0.57 acres arising from the reduction shall be apportioned as follows: Ann Kibet 0.141 acres, Elizabeth Jepkoech Kogo 0.110 acres, Pius Kortom 0.197 acres, Paul Kandie 0.110 acres.