[2021] KEHC 5728 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 5728 (KLR)

The court found that the revocation of the grant was improper because the sole administratrix had died prior to the issuance of the notice to show cause, and there was no evidence that the notice was served on any beneficiary. As a result, the orders revoking the grant and closing the file were set aside. However,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 5728 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Viren Kiritkant Motichand Shah; Respondent: Alka Kiritkant Motichand Shah (deceased)
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 29 of 2012
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Revocation of Grant and for Fresh Grant
Outcome
Application allowed in part; previous revocation order set aside; previous grant revoked as inoperative; fresh grant to issue to applicant.
Judges
JO Nyarangi
Legal Topics
Succession, Grant of Letters of Administration, Revocation of Grant, Deceased Estate Management
Source Language
en
Family and Children Succession Grant of Letters of Administration Revocation of Grant Deceased Estate Management

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Viren Kiritkant Motichand Shah

Applicant

Alka Kiritkant Motichand Shah (deceased)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Revocation of Grant and for Fresh Grant

  1. 1 Whether the revocation of the grant of representation was proper in light of the death of the sole administratrix and lack of service of notice to show cause.
  2. 2 Whether a fresh grant of letters of administration should issue to the applicant as the sole surviving beneficiary.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the revocation of the grant was improper because the sole administratrix had died prior to the issuance of the notice to show cause, and there was no evidence that the notice was served on any beneficiary. As a result, the orders revoking the grant and closing the file were set aside. However, since the sole administratrix was deceased, the existing grant had become useless and inoperative under section 76(e) of the Law of Succession Act. The court therefore revoked the previous grant and ordered that a fresh grant of letters of administration debonis non be issued to the applicant, the only surviving beneficiary, as the sole administrator. The applicant was directed...

Court Disposition

Application allowed in part; previous revocation order set aside; previous grant revoked as inoperative; fresh grant to issue to applicant.

Orders

  • The orders of 22nd September 2017 revoking the grant and closing the file are set aside.
  • The grant issued to Alka Kiritkant Motichand Shah on 25th May 2012 is revoked as useless and inoperative.