[2024] KEHC 13180 (KLR)

[2024] KEHC 13180 (KLR)

The court found that there was an error apparent on the face of the record regarding the deceased's share in Land Parcel Subukia/SubukiaWest/Block 1/7, as both the applicant and the administrator acknowledged the correct share to be four and a half acres. The administrator did not oppose the application for review,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEHC 13180 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Mary Lucy Muthoni; Respondent: Nina Grace Wango; Interested Party: Edwards Gali Wango
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nakuru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 655 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Review of Confirmed Grant
Outcome
application for review allowed; certificate of confirmed grant reviewed; land to be sold and proceeds shared equally among beneficiaries; interim orders vacated; no order as to costs.
Judges
SM Mohochi
Legal Topics
Confirmation of Grant, Review of Court Orders, Distribution of Estate, Beneficiary Rights
Source Language
en
Family and Children Land and Property Confirmation of Grant Review of Court Orders Distribution of Estate Beneficiary Rights

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mary Lucy Muthoni

Applicant

Nina Grace Wango

Respondent

Edwards Gali Wango

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Review of Confirmed Grant

  1. 1 Whether the certificate of confirmed grant should be reviewed to reflect the correct share of the deceased in Land Parcel Subukia/SubukiaWest/Block 1/7.
  2. 2 Whether the proceeds from the sale of the land parcel should be shared equally among the beneficiaries.
  3. 3 Whether interim orders previously granted should be vacated.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that there was an error apparent on the face of the record regarding the deceased's share in Land Parcel Subukia/SubukiaWest/Block 1/7, as both the applicant and the administrator acknowledged the correct share to be four and a half acres. The administrator did not oppose the application for review, and all parties agreed on the actual entitlement. The court held that it was just and proper to review the certificate of confirmed grant to reflect the correct share and to order that the land be sold with proceeds shared equally among the beneficiaries. The court also vacated any interim orders previously granted and directed that any disputes regarding subdivision be...

Court Disposition

application for review allowed; certificate of confirmed grant reviewed; land to be sold and proceeds shared equally among beneficiaries; interim orders vacated; no order as to costs.

Orders

  • The certificate of confirmed grant dated 2nd April 2024 is reviewed in relation to Land Parcel Subukia/SubukiaWest/Block 1/7 to reflect a share of four and a half (4.5) acres.
  • The land parcel is to be sold and proceeds shared equally among the listed beneficiaries.