[2018] KEHC 1621 (KLR)

[2018] KEHC 1621 (KLR)

The court found that both administrators agreed on the list of dependants and the fact that some beneficiaries had received gifts inter vivos from the deceased. The court held that, pursuant to Section 38 of the Law of Succession Act, the estate should be distributed equally among the surviving children, as there...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEHC 1621 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Caroline Keeru Rwigi; Respondent: Aggrey Nyaga Rwigi
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Chuka
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 72 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Judgment
Outcome
Grant confirmed; estate distributed as per judgment; no order as to costs.
Judges
BB Limo
Legal Topics
Intestate Succession, Distribution of Estate, Gifts Inter Vivos, Dependants Rights
Source Language
en
Family and Children Intestate Succession Distribution of Estate Gifts Inter Vivos Dependants Rights

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Caroline Keeru Rwigi

Applicant

Aggrey Nyaga Rwigi

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the proposed distribution of the deceased's estate complies with the Law of Succession Act, particularly Sections 38 and 42.
  2. 2 Whether gifts inter vivos made by the deceased should be taken into account in the final distribution of the estate.
  3. 3 Whether all dependants are entitled to equal shares of the estate in the absence of a surviving spouse.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that both administrators agreed on the list of dependants and the fact that some beneficiaries had received gifts inter vivos from the deceased. The court held that, pursuant to Section 38 of the Law of Succession Act, the estate should be distributed equally among the surviving children, as there was no surviving spouse. However, in accordance with Section 42, the court determined that gifts inter vivos previously given by the deceased must be factored into the final distribution, so that those who had already benefited would receive less from the remaining estate. The court reviewed the proposals from both parties and, applying the statutory provisions, confirmed the...

Court Disposition

Grant confirmed; estate distributed as per judgment; no order as to costs.

Orders

  • Grant issued on 26th April, 2017 confirmed under the terms set out in the judgment.
  • Estate properties distributed among the listed dependants as specified, taking into account gifts inter vivos.