[2018] KEHC 1088 (KLR)
The court held that the Law of Succession Act, specifically Section 38, mandates equal distribution of the estate among all surviving children where the deceased died intestate and without a surviving spouse. The court found that the petitioner's proposal was not in line with the law as it discriminated against the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEHC 1088 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Silas Miriti Mbiuki; Respondent: Sarah Muthoni; Respondent: Wanja Mbiuki; Respondent: Deborah Karendi
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Chuka
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 390 of 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- Grant confirmed; estate distributed equally among children as per Section 38 of the Law of Succession Act.
- Judges
- BB Limo
- Legal Topics
- Intestate Succession, Distribution of Estate, Equal Sharing Among Children
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Silas Miriti Mbiuki
Applicant
Sarah Muthoni
Respondent
Wanja Mbiuki
Respondent
Deborah Karendi
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proposed distribution of the deceased's estate was equal and equitable among all beneficiaries.
- 2 Whether daughters of the deceased were discriminated against in the proposed distribution.
- 3 Whether the law requires equal distribution among all children where the deceased died intestate without a surviving spouse.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the Law of Succession Act, specifically Section 38, mandates equal distribution of the estate among all surviving children where the deceased died intestate and without a surviving spouse. The court found that the petitioner's proposal was not in line with the law as it discriminated against the daughters. The court confirmed the grant on the basis of equal sharing, allocating each child an equal share of the estate, and recognizing the consensus that one parcel should go to the grandchild, Falidis Murithi Silas. The court emphasized that fairness and equality are paramount in the distribution of an intestate estate, and any deviation from equal sharing must be...
Court Disposition
Grant confirmed; estate distributed equally among children as per Section 38 of the Law of Succession Act.
Orders
- Grant issued to Silas Miriti Mbiuki on 29th October, 2012 is confirmed.
- L.R. No. Muthambi/U.Karimba/58 to be distributed: Silas Miriti Mbiuki - 1.52 acres; Abel Mbae Mbiuki - 1.52 acres; Lawrence Kithinji Mbiuki - 1.52 acres; Sarah Muthoni, Deborah Karendi, and Wanja Mbiuki - 4 acres jointly.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
68 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT CHUKA
SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 390 OF 2015
(FORMERLY SUCCESSION CAUSE NO.292 OF 2012)
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF THE LATE M'MBIUKI M'RINDIRI (DECEASED)
AND
SILAS MIRITI MBIUKI................................................................PETITIONER
VERSUS
SARAH MUTHONI.................................................................1ST PROTESTOR
WANJA MBIUKI.....................................................................2ND PROTESTOR
DEBORAH KARENDI..............................................................3RD PROTESTOR
J U D G M E N T
1. This cause relates to the estate of the late M'MBURIA M'NDIRI (deceased) who died on 10th September 2003 at Chogoria Hospital domiciled at Mugumango Tharaka Nithi County. He died intestate living the following dependants surviving him namely:-
(i) Silas Miriti Mbiuki
(ii) Dorothy Igoji (deceased)
(iii) Abel Mbae Mbiuki
(iv) Gedion Mugambi Mbiuki
(v) Sarah Muthoni
(vi) Wanja Mbiuki
(vii) Lawrence Kithinji Mbiuki
(viii) Deborah Karendi
2. The properties forming the estate of the deceased in this cause are;
(i) L.R. Muthambi/U.Karimba/58
(ii) L.R. Mwimbi/S. Mugumango/610 &
(iii) L.R Muthambi/U.Karimba/353
3. The Petitioner herein, Silas Miriti Mbiuki, was appointed the administrator of the estate of the deceased herein on 29th October, 2012 and issued with a grant of letters of administration, on 22nd November, 2016. He moved this court for confirmation of the said grant giving the following proposal on how the estate should be distributed.
a) L.R Muthambi/U.Karimba/58- 3. 4 ha
(i) Silas Miriti Mbiuki - 0. 77 ha
(ii) Lawrence Kithinji Mbiuki - 0. 93 ha
(iii) Abel Mbae Mbiuki - 0. 85 ha
(iv) Gedion Mugambi Mbiuki - 0. 40 ha
b) L.R. Muthambi/U.Karimba/353 - 0. 6 ha
Falidis Murithi Silas - whole
c) L.R. Mwimbi/S. Mugumango/610 - 0. 89 ha
(i) Gedion Mugambi Mbiuki - 0. 40 ha
(ii) Abel Mbae Mbiuki - 0. 23 ha
(iii) Silas Miriti Mbiuki - 0. 26 ha
4. The above proposal met stiff resistance from Sarah Muthoni who swore an affidavit of protest on her own behalf and Wanja Mbiuki and Deborah Karendi. The main bone of contention was that the proposal made was neither equal nor equitable. The protestor deposed that the daughters of thedeceased had been discriminated and proposed that the sons of the deceased be given 2 acres each out of parcel No.Muthambi/U.Karimba/58 while the daughters be given 2. 5 acres to share. She also proposed that Gedion Mugambi Mbiuki be given the whole of L.R. Mwimbi/S.Mugumango/610.
5. The protest herein was heard before this court and it transpired that the children of the deceased had disagreed over an issue they ought to have agreed on because the bone of contention was fair distribution of the estate. All the children of the deceased recognize one another and so it is fairly a straight forward case. The deceased died intestate with no surviving spouse. He had 8 children one of whom is deceased. All parties are in agreement that one Falidis Murithi Silas should be considered as a dependant as he is a grandchild of the deceased herein. In view of the apparent disagreement on the question of distribution, this court is left with no other option but to apply the relevant law under Section 38 of Law of Succession Act which provide that where a deceased dies intestate with no surviving spouse, the estate should be divided equally among the surviving children. The estate herein comprise the following properties namely:-
(a) L.R. Muthambi/U.Karimba/353 - 1. 5 acres
(b) L.R. Muthambi/U.Karimba/58 - 8. 5 acres
(c) L.R. Muthambi/S. Mugumango/610- 2. 2 acres
Total 12. 2 acres
The parties are in consensus that Muthambi/U.Karimba/353 should go to Falidis Murithi Silas which leave around 10. 7 acres available for distribution among the 7 children meaning that each dependant is entitled to a share of 1. 52 acres.
6. In the premises this court hereby confirms the grant issued to Silas Miriti Mbiuki on 29th October, 2012 on the following mode of distribution.
(a) L.R. No. Muthambi/U.Karimba/58
(1) Silas Miriti Mbiuki - 1. 52 acres
(2) Abel Mbae Mbiuki - 1. 52 acres
(3) Lawrence Kithinji Mbiuki - 1. 52 acres
(4) Sarah Muthoni
Deborah Karendi - 4 acres jointly
Wanja Mbiuki
(b) L.R. Muthambi/U.Karimba/353
Falidi Murithi Silas - whole
(c) L.R. Mwimbi/S. Mugumango/610
(i) Gedion Mugambi Mbiuki - 1. 52 acres
(ii) Sarah Muthoni
Deborah Karendi - 0. 68 acres jointly
Wanja Mbiuki
I shall make no order as to costs as this is a family matter.
Dated, signed and delivered at Chuka this 18th day of December, 2018.
R.K. LIMO
JUDGE
18/12/2018
Judgment signed, dated and delivered in the presence of protestors and the petitioner.
R.K. LIMO
JUDGE
18/12/2018