[2024] KEHC 13111 (KLR)

[2024] KEHC 13111 (KLR)

The court determined that, given the existence of competing applications and serious allegations including fraud and criminal activity, it was necessary to stay all prior orders and consolidate the applications for hearing. The court emphasized the need for all parties to respond and file submissions, and for the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEHC 13111 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Isaac Kibet Laboso; Respondent: Margaret Sawe
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nakuru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 65 of 1982
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Interlocutory Ruling on Chamber Summons and Certificate of Urgency
Outcome
interlocutory orders issued; applications consolidated for hearing; temporary stay granted
Judges
SM Mohochi
Legal Topics
Estate Administration, Title Cancellation, Ownership Declaration, Distribution of Estate, Allegations of Fraud
Source Language
en
Family and Children Land and Property Estate Administration Title Cancellation Ownership Declaration Distribution of Estate Allegations of Fraud

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Isaac Kibet Laboso

Applicant

Margaret Sawe

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Interlocutory Ruling on Chamber Summons and Certificate of Urgency

  1. 1 Whether the Registrar of Titles should be summoned to explain transactions relating to LR No.11964/4 between 1993 and 2018.
  2. 2 Whether a declaration as to ownership of LR No.11964/4 should be made.
  3. 3 Whether orders of cancellation and restoration of titles should issue.

Ratio Decidendi

The court determined that, given the existence of competing applications and serious allegations including fraud and criminal activity, it was necessary to stay all prior orders and consolidate the applications for hearing. The court emphasized the need for all parties to respond and file submissions, and for the process to be conducted with integrity. The court further directed that no advocate may swear affidavits on behalf of clients, reinforcing the requirement for personal knowledge in evidence. The court issued a temporary stay of orders made on 25th April, 2024, pending the hearing and determination of both the 8th July and 25th October, 2024 applications. The court also forewarned...

Court Disposition

interlocutory orders issued; applications consolidated for hearing; temporary stay granted

Orders

  • A temporary order of stay of orders made on 25th April, 2024 is hereby issued pending hearing and determination of applications dated 8th July, 2024 and 25th October, 2024.
  • The Application dated 25th October, 2024 shall be treated as a response to the Application dated 8th July, 2024.