[2021] KEHC 8644 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 8644 (KLR)

The court found that the omission of parcel Ndivisi/Ndivisi/219 from the original judgment was an error apparent on the face of the record. In the interests of justice and to ensure a fair and lawful distribution of the deceased's estate, the court exercised its power of review to include the omitted parcel in the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 8644 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Saulo Wafula Sikwata; Respondent: Joseph Wekesa Sikwata; Respondent: Timina Sikwata Sikwata; Respondent: Vincent Wambila Sifumbukho; Respondent: David Khisa Wabwile; Respondent: Alfayo Wanjala Watila
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Bungoma
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 370 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Review
Outcome
Application for review allowed; estate distribution rectified to include omitted parcel.
Judges
SN Riechi
Legal Topics
Succession of Estates, Distribution of Land, Rectification of Grant
Source Language
en
Family and Children Land and Property Succession of Estates Distribution of Land Rectification of Grant

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 22
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Saulo Wafula Sikwata

Applicant

Joseph Wekesa Sikwata

Respondent

Timina Sikwata Sikwata

Respondent

Vincent Wambila Sifumbukho

Respondent

David Khisa Wabwile

Respondent

Alfayo Wanjala Watila

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Review

  1. 1 Whether the omission of parcel Ndivisi/Ndivisi/219 from the original distribution constituted an error requiring review.
  2. 2 How the estate of the deceased, specifically parcels Ndivisi/Ndivisi/246 and Ndivisi/Ndivisi/219, should be distributed among the beneficiaries.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the omission of parcel Ndivisi/Ndivisi/219 from the original judgment was an error apparent on the face of the record. In the interests of justice and to ensure a fair and lawful distribution of the deceased's estate, the court exercised its power of review to include the omitted parcel in the distribution. The court then proceeded to allocate both parcels Ndivisi/Ndivisi/246 and Ndivisi/Ndivisi/219 among the listed beneficiaries, rectifying the earlier oversight and ensuring that all assets of the estate were properly distributed in accordance with the law and the confirmed grant.

Court Disposition

Application for review allowed; estate distribution rectified to include omitted parcel.

Orders

  • The distribution of the estate as per the judgment dated 30.10.2020 is reviewed to include parcel Ndivisi/Ndivisi/219.
  • Parcel Ndivisi/Ndivisi/246 is distributed among the listed beneficiaries in the specified acreages.