[2024] KEHC 11629 (KLR)
The court found that the properties Nyandarua/Olaragwai/229 and Nyandarua/Mumui/344 were never registered in the name of the deceased, Wathuko Chongo. Documentary evidence, including green cards, showed that one parcel was registered to Tabitha Wanjiku and the other was transferred to Nderi Wathuko Chongo by a third...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEHC 11629 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Wathuko Nderi Chongo; Respondent: Nderi Wathuko Chongo; Respondent: Peter Nderi Chongo; Respondent: Seraphine Wanjiku Wathuko
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 2171 of 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Application to Amend Certificate of Confirmation of Grant and Vary Consent Order
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Judges
- HK Chemitei
- Legal Topics
- Distribution of Estate, Confirmation of Grant, Beneficiary Rights, Land Registration, Fraudulent Transfer, Consent Orders
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Wathuko Nderi Chongo
Applicant
Nderi Wathuko Chongo
Respondent
Peter Nderi Chongo
Respondent
Seraphine Wanjiku Wathuko
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application to Amend Certificate of Confirmation of Grant and Vary Consent Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the certificate of confirmation of grant should be amended to include or vary distribution of certain land parcels alleged to have belonged to the deceased.
- 2 Whether the consent order of 6th May 2013 should be varied regarding the distribution of specific properties.
- 3 Whether the court has jurisdiction to determine claims of fraud or ownership over properties not registered in the deceased's name.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the properties Nyandarua/Olaragwai/229 and Nyandarua/Mumui/344 were never registered in the name of the deceased, Wathuko Chongo. Documentary evidence, including green cards, showed that one parcel was registered to Tabitha Wanjiku and the other was transferred to Nderi Wathuko Chongo by a third party. As such, these properties do not form part of the deceased's estate and cannot be distributed through the succession proceedings. The court further held that any claims of fraud or entitlement to these properties must be pursued in a different forum, as the succession court lacks jurisdiction to determine ownership or fraud where the deceased was not the registered...
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The application dated 3rd November 2022 is dismissed.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
32 paragraphs
In re Estate of the Late Wathuko Chongo alias Wathuko Chongo Wathuko (Deceased) (Succession Cause 2171 of 2001) [2024] KEHC 11629 (KLR) (Family) (3 October 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 11629 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Family
Succession Cause 2171 of 2001
HK Chemitei, J
October 3, 2024
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF THE LATE WATHUKO CHONGO alias WATHUKO CHONGO WATHUKO (DECEASED)
Between
Wathuko Nderi Chongo
Applicant
and
Nderi Wathuko Chongo
1st Respondent
Peter Nderi Chongo
2nd Respondent
Seraphine Wanjiku Wathuko
3rd Respondent
Ruling
1. In his application dated 3rd November 2022 the Applicant seeks the following orders:-(a)That the certificate of confirmation of grant issued to the said Wathuko Nderi Chongo, Nderi Wathuko Chongo, Peter Nderi Chongo and Seraphine Wanjiku Chongo in this matter on 6th May 2013 be amended.(b)That the consent order recorded on the 6th May 2013 be varied in respect of the agricultural land in following terms:-(i)The beneficiaries in distributing LR No. Nyandarua/Olaragwai/288, Nyandarua/Mumui/ Olaragwai/185, Nyandarua Mumui/Olaragwai /186, Mawingu scheme plots 49 Mawingu scheme plots 50 ,Kiarutara location 16, kiarutara location 14, Mwagu 16/135 and Turasha ridge plot 3, the court/parties to consider LR Nos Nyandarua/Olaragwai/229 measuring 44. 5 acres which was acquired by the deceased and transferred to the first house.(ii)The beneficiaries in distributing LR No Nyandarua/Olaragwai/288, Nyandarua Mumui/ Olaragwai/185, Nyandarua Mumui/Olaragwai /186, Mawingu settlement scheme plots 49 and 50, Kiarutara location 16 and 14, Mwagu 16/135 and Turasha ridge plot 3, the court parties to consider LR No Nyandarua/Mumui/344 which was acquired by the deceased and fraudulently transferred to Nderi Wathuko Chongo of the first house.
2. The Applicant has also prayed for costs of the application.
3. The application is based on the sworn affidavit of the Applicant dated the same date.
4. The application is opposed by the respondents vide the preliminary objection dated 15th February 2023 in which they stated that the properties namely Nyandarua/Olaragwai/229 was registered in the name of the late Tabitha Wanjiku and parcel number Nyandarua/ Olaragwai/344 belonged to Nderi Wathuko Chongo and not the deceased herein.
5. The 1st Applicant has further in opposition to the application sworn an affidavit dated 21st November 2022 to exemplify and to buttress the assertion contained in the preliminary objection.
6. The court has perused the annexures to the replying affidavit above and it is evident that land parcel number Nyandarua/Olaragwai/ 229 was transferred from Settlement Fund Trustees to the late Tabitha Wanjiku on 7th October 1977 and at no time the deceased herein was the registered owner.
7. At the same time land parcel number Nyandarua/Mumui/344 was transferred to Nderi Wathuko Chongo on 15th December 2008 by one Maina Kimemia.
8. The green cards attached to the said replying affidavit states as much.
9. In view of the above evidence and in view of this courts ruling of 11th July 2024 I find that the preliminary objection is meritorious. The Applicant ought to pursue his claim over the two properties in another forum and not this court. His deceased father was never a registered owner of any of the two parcels. If there were any family arrangements then perhaps it ought to have been captured in the consent filed settling the estate.
10. At the same time if there was any fraud as alleged by the Applicant then this court will not be able to deal with the same for the reasons that the deceased was never the registered owner of the two parcels.
11. In the premises I do not find any merit in the application and the same is hereby dismissed with no order as to costs.
DATED SIGNED AND DELIVERED VIA VIDEO LINK AT NAIROBI THIS 3RD DAY OF OCTOBER 2024. H K CHEMITEIJUDGE