[2019] KEHC 1545 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 1545 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had demonstrated a legitimate stake in the estate of the deceased, particularly in light of the order issued in Kakamega High Court civil case 461 of 1993. The applicant's status as a beneficiary entitled him to seek substitution as co-administrator following the death of the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEHC 1545 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Dickson Wafula Abayo; Respondent: Gladys Auma Mugeni
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Busia
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Probate & Administration 23 of 1999
Procedural Posture
Probate and Administration / Ruling on Substitution and Amendment of Grant
Outcome
Application allowed in terms of prayers (a) and (b); no order as to costs.
Judges
KW Kiarie
Legal Topics
Succession, Grant of Letters of Administration, Substitution of Administrator, Beneficiary Rights
Source Language
en
Family and Children Succession Grant of Letters of Administration Substitution of Administrator Beneficiary Rights

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Dickson Wafula Abayo

Applicant

Gladys Auma Mugeni

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Probate and Administration / Ruling on Substitution and Amendment of Grant

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be substituted as co-administrator following the death of the original petitioner.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant has locus standi as a beneficiary of the estate.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had demonstrated a legitimate stake in the estate of the deceased, particularly in light of the order issued in Kakamega High Court civil case 461 of 1993. The applicant's status as a beneficiary entitled him to seek substitution as co-administrator following the death of the original petitioner. The objections raised by the respondent regarding locus standi and alleged abuse of process were not substantiated. Consequently, the court allowed the application for substitution and directed that an amended grant of letters of administration be issued to both the applicant and the respondent as co-administrators. No order was made as to costs.

Court Disposition

Application allowed in terms of prayers (a) and (b); no order as to costs.

Orders

  • The deceased petitioner is substituted with the applicant and the respondent as co-administrators.
  • An amended grant of letters of administration to issue to the applicant and the respondent.