[2019] KEHC 11904 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 11904 (KLR)

The court held that, since the criminal charges against the respondents for forgery were still pending and had not been proved, the allegations amounted to mere accusations at this stage. Revocation of the grant under section 76(b) of the Law of Succession Act on the basis of fraud could only be considered if and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEHC 11904 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Daniel Njenga Muiruri; Applicant: Joseph Mwaniki Muiruri; Applicant: Moses Wainaina; Respondent: Esther Njeri Mburu; Respondent: Ann Wangui Muthee
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 2099 of 2007
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Revocation or Stay of Grant Pending Criminal Proceedings
Outcome
Application for revocation of grant dismissed at this stage; implementation of certificate of confirmation stayed pending conclusion of criminal proceedings.
Judges
AO Muchelule
Legal Topics
Revocation of Grant, Probate and Administration, Fraud in Succession, Criminal Proceedings Effect, Presumption of Innocence
Source Language
en
Family and Children Revocation of Grant Probate and Administration Fraud in Succession Criminal Proceedings Effect Presumption of Innocence

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Daniel Njenga Muiruri

Applicant

Joseph Mwaniki Muiruri

Applicant

Moses Wainaina

Applicant

Esther Njeri Mburu

Respondent

Ann Wangui Muthee

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Revocation or Stay of Grant Pending Criminal Proceedings

  1. 1 Whether the grant of letters of administration intestate should be revoked on grounds of alleged forgery pending the outcome of criminal proceedings.
  2. 2 Whether the implementation of the certificate of confirmation should be stayed until the conclusion of the criminal case.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that, since the criminal charges against the respondents for forgery were still pending and had not been proved, the allegations amounted to mere accusations at this stage. Revocation of the grant under section 76(b) of the Law of Succession Act on the basis of fraud could only be considered if and when the criminal court found the respondents guilty of forgery. However, given the possibility that the grant may have been fraudulently obtained, the court found it prudent to halt and suspend further implementation and execution of the certificate of confirmation until the criminal proceedings were concluded. This approach balanced the need to protect the integrity of the...

Court Disposition

Application for revocation of grant dismissed at this stage; implementation of certificate of confirmation stayed pending conclusion of criminal proceedings.

Orders

  • Further implementation and execution of the certificate of confirmation issued on 7th May 2013 is halted and suspended until the criminal proceedings have been concluded.
  • No order as to costs.