[2018] KEHC 5714 (KLR)

[2018] KEHC 5714 (KLR)

The court held that the beneficiaries of the deceased's estate are his children, and where a child is deceased, their share devolves to their children in equal shares. The estate comprises the listed parcels of land, bank accounts, and partnership interest. The court found that any purported sale or disposal of...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEHC 5714 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Nelson Muchangi Wachira; Respondent: Samwel Migwi Wachira
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nyeri
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 1341 of 1993
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Judgment
Outcome
Grant confirmed on 16th April 2009 revoked; fresh grant to issue in the name of the protester; estate to be distributed equally among beneficiaries as specified; each party to bear its own costs.
Judges
NA Matheka
Legal Topics
Intestate Succession, Distribution of Estate, Intermeddling With Estate, Confirmation of Grant
Source Language
en
Family and Children Intestate Succession Distribution of Estate Intermeddling With Estate Confirmation of Grant

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Nelson Muchangi Wachira

Applicant

Samwel Migwi Wachira

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Who are the beneficiaries of the deceased's estate?.
  2. 2 What constitutes the estate of the deceased?.
  3. 3 Who is beneficially entitled to the estate and what are their respective shares?.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the beneficiaries of the deceased's estate are his children, and where a child is deceased, their share devolves to their children in equal shares. The estate comprises the listed parcels of land, bank accounts, and partnership interest. The court found that any purported sale or disposal of estate property before confirmation of the grant was unlawful and amounted to intermeddling, rendering such transactions null and void. The grant previously confirmed was revoked, and a fresh grant was issued in the name of the protester. The estate was ordered to be distributed equally among the beneficiaries as per the law, with specific shares allocated to each family or...

Court Disposition

Grant confirmed on 16th April 2009 revoked; fresh grant to issue in the name of the protester; estate to be distributed equally among beneficiaries as specified; each party to bear its own costs.

Orders

  • The grant confirmed on 16th April 2009 is revoked.
  • A fresh grant to issue in the name of the protester.