[2022] KEHC 12465 (KLR)

[2022] KEHC 12465 (KLR)

The court held that rectification of the grant was only necessary to correct the spelling of Thomas Gathuta Wahome's name to Thomas Gatutha Wahome. The other prayers, including the inclusion of co-administrators on form P&A 41 and correction of another applicant's name, had already been addressed in a previous...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEHC 12465 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Cecilia Thogori Wanjeru; Applicant: Thomas Gatutha Wahome; Applicant: Cecilia Mumbi
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nyeri
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 142 of 1992
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Rectification of Grant
Outcome
partly allowed
Judges
FN Muchemi
Legal Topics
Rectification of Grant, Letters of Administration, Estate Administration, Name Correction
Source Language
en
Family and Children Rectification of Grant Letters of Administration Estate Administration Name Correction

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Cecilia Thogori Wanjeru

Applicant

Thomas Gatutha Wahome

Applicant

Cecilia Mumbi

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Rectification of Grant

  1. 1 Whether the grant of letters of administration intestate should be rectified to correct the names of the administrators.
  2. 2 Whether it is necessary to file a fresh application to include co-administrators on form P&A 41 after court appointment.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that rectification of the grant was only necessary to correct the spelling of Thomas Gathuta Wahome's name to Thomas Gatutha Wahome. The other prayers, including the inclusion of co-administrators on form P&A 41 and correction of another applicant's name, had already been addressed in a previous application and granted in the court's earlier ruling. Therefore, repeating those prayers was unnecessary and amounted to duplication. The court emphasized that once a co-administrator is appointed by court order, no further application is required to reflect this on the relevant forms, as the order itself is sufficient authority for amendment. The court thus allowed only the...

Court Disposition

partly allowed

Orders

  • The name of Thomas Gathuta Wahome is rectified to read Thomas Gatutha Wahome in the grant.
  • Other prayers are struck out as they were previously granted.