[2017] KEHC 6026 (KLR)

[2017] KEHC 6026 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant is entitled to seek a second opinion through the appellate process, as provided by law. The right of appeal is fundamental, and the applicant demonstrated sufficient grounds for leave to appeal. The court also found it just to grant a stay of execution of the consent order to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEHC 6026 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Applicant (Name not specified); Respondent: Respondent (Name not specified)
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 2111 of 2005
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Stay and Leave to Appeal
Outcome
Application allowed.
Judges
DN Musyoka, MW Muigai
Legal Topics
Succession Procedure, Leave to Appeal, Stay of Execution
Source Language
en
Family and Children Succession Procedure Leave to Appeal Stay of Execution

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Applicant (Name not specified)

Applicant

Respondent (Name not specified)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Stay and Leave to Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to leave to appeal against the orders made on 6th February 2015.
  2. 2 Whether a stay of execution of the consent recorded on 24th June 2009 should be granted pending appeal.
  3. 3 Whether the matter should be transferred to the High Court of Kenya at Kiambu for further proceedings.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant is entitled to seek a second opinion through the appellate process, as provided by law. The right of appeal is fundamental, and the applicant demonstrated sufficient grounds for leave to appeal. The court also found it just to grant a stay of execution of the consent order to preserve the status quo pending the intended appeal. Furthermore, since the assets in question are located in Kiambu County, the court ordered the transfer of the matter to the High Court at Kiambu for further proceedings, in line with jurisdictional requirements.

Court Disposition

Application allowed.

Orders

  • Leave granted to the applicant to file appeal at the Court of Appeal against the decision of 6th February 2015 within thirty (30) days.
  • Stay of execution of the consent recorded on 24th June 2009 granted for thirty (30) days.