[2020] KEHC 2659 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 2659 (KLR)

The court found that, despite previous attempts at settlement through family meetings and alternative dispute resolution, not all parties were present or represented, and the outstanding issues regarding the distribution of the estate remain unresolved. The court therefore directed that the summons for revocation of...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEHC 2659 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Steven Barry Chebochok; Applicant: Richard Malakwen Arap Chebochok; Respondent: Jonathan Kibaibai Arap Rogony; Respondent: Philip Kipyegon Mason; Respondent: Erick Kibii Arap Rogony
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kericho
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 4 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Directions on Hearing of Summons for Revocation of Grant
Outcome
Summons for revocation of grant to proceed to hearing by viva voce evidence; parties to file witness statements within 14 days.
Judges
AN Ongeri
Legal Topics
Succession, Revocation of Grant, Administration of Estates, Distribution of Estate
Source Language
en
Family and Children Succession Revocation of Grant Administration of Estates Distribution of Estate

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Steven Barry Chebochok

Applicant

Richard Malakwen Arap Chebochok

Applicant

Jonathan Kibaibai Arap Rogony

Respondent

Philip Kipyegon Mason

Respondent

Erick Kibii Arap Rogony

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Directions on Hearing of Summons for Revocation of Grant

  1. 1 Whether the summons for revocation of grant dated 24/9/2018 should proceed to hearing by viva voce evidence.
  2. 2 Whether the absence of certain beneficiaries and administrators from the family meeting affects the distribution of the estate.
  3. 3 Whether the administrators are fulfilling their duty to distribute the estate in accordance with the law.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that, despite previous attempts at settlement through family meetings and alternative dispute resolution, not all parties were present or represented, and the outstanding issues regarding the distribution of the estate remain unresolved. The court therefore directed that the summons for revocation of grant dated 24/9/2018 should proceed to hearing by viva voce evidence, with all parties required to file their witness statements within 14 days. The court emphasized the duty of administrators to ensure lawful and equitable distribution of the estate and the importance of involving all beneficiaries in the process.

Court Disposition

Summons for revocation of grant to proceed to hearing by viva voce evidence; parties to file witness statements within 14 days.

Orders

  • Parties to file their witness statements within 14 days of the date of the order.
  • Hearing of the summons for revocation of grant dated 24/9/2018 to proceed by viva voce evidence as earlier directed.