[2021] KEHC 7500 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 7500 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had provided a reasonable explanation for the delay in filing the Notice of Appeal, particularly in light of the disruptions caused by the Covid-19 pandemic. The court was satisfied that no prejudice would be caused to the respondent by granting the orders sought. Consequently, the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 7500 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Esther Kakenya Magiro; Respondent: Lilian Reteti Momboshi
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kisii
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 607 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Succession Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
REA Ougo
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Leave to Appeal, Succession Proceedings
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Family and Children Extension of Time Leave to Appeal Succession Proceedings

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Esther Kakenya Magiro

Applicant

Lilian Reteti Momboshi

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be granted extension of time to file an application for leave to appeal against the judgment and decree.
  2. 2 Whether leave should be granted to the applicant to lodge an appeal to the Court of Appeal against the ruling.
  3. 3 Whether the time to lodge a Notice of Appeal against the decree should be enlarged.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had provided a reasonable explanation for the delay in filing the Notice of Appeal, particularly in light of the disruptions caused by the Covid-19 pandemic. The court was satisfied that no prejudice would be caused to the respondent by granting the orders sought. Consequently, the court exercised its discretion to extend the time for filing the application for leave to appeal, granted leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal, and enlarged the time for lodging a Notice of Appeal. The court also deemed the Notice of Appeal already filed as duly filed and served, ensuring that the applicant's right to appeal was preserved in the interests of justice.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • Time within which the 1st petitioner/applicant can file and/or lodge an application for leave to appeal against the judgment and decree of the court rendered on 2/5/2015 is extended.
  • Leave is granted to the 1st petitioner/applicant to lodge an appeal to the Court of Appeal against the ruling dated 2/5/2021 within 30 days from the date of this ruling.