[2021] KEHC 8850 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 8850 (KLR)

The court held that since the applicant is a beneficiary under the confirmed grant, which provides for a 50:50 holding in trust for each household, her interests are already protected by the confirmation order. If she feels disinherited or deprived of her share, her remedy is to sue for her share in the trust...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 8850 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Noel Opanda; Respondent: Margaret Aluoch Ongeta; Respondent: Jennifer Abutu Owande
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Siaya
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 75 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Revocation of Grant
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
RE Aburili
Legal Topics
Succession, Confirmation of Grant, Trusts in Estate, Beneficial Interest
Source Language
en
Family and Children Succession Confirmation of Grant Trusts in Estate Beneficial Interest

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Noel Opanda

Applicant

Margaret Aluoch Ongeta

Respondent

Jennifer Abutu Owande

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Revocation of Grant

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to revocation of the confirmed grant where she has a beneficial interest in the estate.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant's remedy lies in revocation or in suing for her share as a beneficiary under trust.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that since the applicant is a beneficiary under the confirmed grant, which provides for a 50:50 holding in trust for each household, her interests are already protected by the confirmation order. If she feels disinherited or deprived of her share, her remedy is to sue for her share in the trust estate, not to seek revocation of the grant. The application for revocation was therefore found to be incompetent and dismissed.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application dated 3/2/2021 is dismissed with no orders as to costs.
  • File closed.