[2024] KEHC 16351 (KLR)

[2024] KEHC 16351 (KLR)

The court declined to grant further partial confirmation of the grant because the applicants failed to provide sufficient particulars regarding the pending litigation and the assets involved. There was no affidavit from the intended purchaser confirming the agreement to purchase the property, and no urgency was...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEHC 16351 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Mary Wanjiku Njiiri; Applicant: David Gikonyo Njiiri; Respondent: Peter Njuguna Mbugua
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nakuru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 9 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Partial Confirmation of Grant
Outcome
application for further partial confirmation of grant rejected
Judges
JM Nang'ea
Legal Topics
Confirmation of Grant, Distribution of Estate, Pending Litigation, Sale of Estate Property
Source Language
en
Family and Children Confirmation of Grant Distribution of Estate Pending Litigation Sale of Estate Property

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mary Wanjiku Njiiri

Applicant

David Gikonyo Njiiri

Applicant

Peter Njuguna Mbugua

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Partial Confirmation of Grant

  1. 1 Whether the court should grant partial confirmation of the grant before all estate assets have been recovered.
  2. 2 Whether the applicants have demonstrated sufficient urgency or justification for further partial confirmation of the grant.
  3. 3 Whether the requirements of section 55 and 71 of the Law of Succession Act have been satisfied.

Ratio Decidendi

The court declined to grant further partial confirmation of the grant because the applicants failed to provide sufficient particulars regarding the pending litigation and the assets involved. There was no affidavit from the intended purchaser confirming the agreement to purchase the property, and no urgency was demonstrated to justify departing from the previous order that final confirmation should await the conclusion of all litigation concerning the estate. The court emphasized that piecemeal confirmation of the grant does not serve the interests of justice and that the estate should be transmitted at once after all assets and liabilities have been identified. Accordingly, the...

Court Disposition

application for further partial confirmation of grant rejected

Orders

  • The application for further partial confirmation of the grant is rejected.