[2015] KEHC 6358 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant, RMN, satisfied all statutory requirements for adoption under the Children’s Act, being of appropriate age, of good character, and having demonstrated the ability to care for the child for over 12 years. The child had been abandoned by her biological mother, who could not be traced...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2015] KEHC 6358 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: RMN; Respondent: EAO (aka EW)
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Murang'a
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Adoption Cause 2 of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Adoption Cause / Ruling
- Outcome
- adoption granted
- Judges
- DW Mbuteti
- Legal Topics
- Adoption Procedure, Best Interest of Child, Dispensation of Parental Consent
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
RMN
Applicant
EAO (aka EW)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant meets the statutory requirements to adopt the child under the Children’s Act.
- 2 Whether the adoption is in the best interest of the child.
- 3 Whether the consent of the biological mother can be dispensed with.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant, RMN, satisfied all statutory requirements for adoption under the Children’s Act, being of appropriate age, of good character, and having demonstrated the ability to care for the child for over 12 years. The child had been abandoned by her biological mother, who could not be traced despite reasonable efforts, justifying the dispensation of her consent. All relevant reports from the guardian ad litem, the adoption society, and the Children’s Department were favourable, confirming that the adoption would serve the best interests of the child. The court concluded that granting the adoption would provide the child with stability, care, and a secure family...
Court Disposition
adoption granted
Orders
- The applicant RMN is authorized to adopt the child EAO (now called EW).
- The consent of the biological mother is dispensed with as she cannot be found.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
18 paragraphs
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MURANG’A
ADOPTION CAUSE NO 2 OF 2014
IN THE MATTER OF THE CHIDREN’S ACT
AND
IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR ADOPTION IN RESPECT TO CHILD EAO (aka EW)
RMN…….…………………..APPLICANT
R U L I N G
1. The Applicant RMN was born in 1951. She is therefore about 64 years old, just below the ceiling of 65 years for adoptions. See section 158(2) (c) of the Children’s Act, Cap 141. She has applied by originating summons dated 6th August 2014 to be permitted to adopt Child EAO (alias EWM).
2. On 12th February 2015 PKN was appointed guardian ad litem to the child. There is a report dated 6th August 2014 by the guardian ad litem which is favourable to the adoption sought.
3. There are two other reports. One is from the adoption society in this matter, Kenya Children’s Home and is dated 26th March 2014. It is favourable to the adoption sought. The second report dated 2nd February 2015 is from the Children’s Department, Murang’a Westunder the Ministry of Labour, Social Security and Services. It is also favourable.
4. The child was born on 6th August 2002 at Pumwani Maternity Hospital, Nairobi to one EAO whose name she was given. Both mother and child were admitted at Kenyatta National Hospitalon 10th August 2002. On the same day the mother abandoned the child at the hospital, never to be seen or heard of again. On 1st November 2002 the child was admitted to the Abandoned Baby Centre, Nairobi for care. The abandonment was reported to the Provincial Children’s Office, Nairobi on or about 8th November 2002. On 27th February 2003 the child was formally committed to care and protection by court order vide Nairobi Protection and Care case No 22 of 2003.
5. On 15th December 2003 the child was released into the custody and care of the Applicant with a view to eventual adoption. The Applicant has had the child continuously and without interruption since then. The child is now going on to 13 years and is in primary school standard 8.
6. The Applicant was once married but was long abandoned by her husband, probably because she did not bear any children of her own. The husband married another wife. The Applicant returned to her parent’s home many years go where she was given land upon which she farms for her sustenance. She does not have any disease or habit that would render her unsuitable as an adoptive parent. Both the Children’s Department and the adoption society have highly approved the way the Applicant has brought up and taken care of the child for the last 12 years. She has the means and the wherewithal to continue taking care of the child to adulthood and beyond.
7. In all these circumstances, I am satisfied that the adoption sought will be in the best interest of the child, and I will grant it. The Applicant RMN is hereby authorized to adopt the child EAO(now called EW For that purpose I hereby dispense with the mother’s consent as she has never been seen or heard of since she abandoned the childover thirteen years ago, and cannot be found. The Registrar-General is hereby directed to make the necessary entry in the prescribed form in the Adoption Children Register. It is so ordered.
DATED AND SIGNED AT MURANG’A THIS 5TH DAY OF MARCH 2015
H P G WAWERU
JUDGE
DELIVERED AT MURANG’A THIS 6th DAY OF MARCH 2015