[2017] KEELC 2477 (KLR)

[2017] KEELC 2477 (KLR)

The court found that the failure to register the charge within the statutory period was due to inadvertence on the part of the applicant's advocate, who mistakenly lodged copies instead of originals with the Registrar of Companies. The court was satisfied that the omission was not intentional and that no prejudice...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEELC 2477 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Faulu Microfinance Bank Limited
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nakuru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Civil Cause 143 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
MA Silau
Legal Topics
Registration of Charges, Extension of Time, Company Law Compliance, Land Security Interests
Source Language
en
Commercial and Corporate Land and Property Registration of Charges Extension of Time Company Law Compliance Land Security Interests

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Faulu Microfinance Bank Limited

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be granted an extension of time to register a charge with the Registrar of Companies after the statutory period has lapsed.
  2. 2 Whether the failure to register the charge within the stipulated period was accidental or due to inadvertence, and if such failure prejudices creditors or members of the company.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the failure to register the charge within the statutory period was due to inadvertence on the part of the applicant's advocate, who mistakenly lodged copies instead of originals with the Registrar of Companies. The court was satisfied that the omission was not intentional and that no prejudice would be caused to creditors or members of the company by granting the extension. The application was made by an interested party, and the court exercised its discretion under Section 888 of the Companies Act, 2015, to allow the extension of time for registration of the charge. The court concluded that it was just and equitable to grant the relief sought, and therefore extended...

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • Time for registration of the charge over Nakuru Municipality/Block 10/51 with the Registrar of Companies is extended by 30 days from the date of this ruling.
  • No order as to costs.