[2015] KEHC 783 (KLR)

[2015] KEHC 783 (KLR)

The court found that the Applicants had satisfied all statutory requirements for international adoption under the Children’s Act, including suitability, continuous care, and positive reports from the Adoption Society and guardian ad litem. The court considered the moratorium on foreign adoptions but determined that,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] KEHC 783 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: J P A B; Applicant: F M B; Respondent: Director of Children’s Services
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Adoption Cause 108 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Judgment
Outcome
adoption granted
Judges
LA Achode
Legal Topics
International Adoption, Best Interests of Child, Adoption Procedure, Foreign Adoption Moratorium
Source Language
en
Family and Children International Adoption Best Interests of Child Adoption Procedure Foreign Adoption Moratorium

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

J P A B

Applicant

F M B

Applicant

Director of Children’s Services

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Adoption Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the Applicants meet the legal requirements for international adoption under Kenyan law.
  2. 2 Whether the moratorium on foreign adoptions precludes the granting of the adoption order in this case.
  3. 3 Whether dispensing with the Director of Children Services' report is permissible in the circumstances.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Applicants had satisfied all statutory requirements for international adoption under the Children’s Act, including suitability, continuous care, and positive reports from the Adoption Society and guardian ad litem. The court considered the moratorium on foreign adoptions but determined that, in the best interests of the child, the absence of a report from the Director of Children’s Services could be dispensed with. The court was satisfied that the Applicants were capable of providing for the child’s welfare and that the adoption would be recognized in France, ensuring the child’s citizenship and legal security. The adoption was therefore granted, with appropriate...

Court Disposition

adoption granted

Orders

  • The Applicants, J P A B and F M B, are allowed to adopt Baby G, who shall henceforth be known as G B Bo.
  • The child’s date of birth is presumed to be 30th August 2013.