[2006] KEHC 2042 (KLR)

[2006] KEHC 2042 (KLR)

The court found that the petitioner had demonstrated sufficient grounds for the restoration of Golden Grain Limited to the Register of Companies. The company continued to operate, owned property, and the failure to file annual returns was due to oversight rather than deliberate non-compliance. The Registrar of...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2006] KEHC 2042 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Petitioner (Member of Golden Grain Limited); Respondent: Registrar of Companies
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 261 of 2006
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling
Outcome
petition allowed in part
Legal Topics
Company Restoration, Dissolution of Company, Annual Returns Noncompliance
Source Language
en
Commercial and Corporate Company Restoration Dissolution of Company Annual Returns Noncompliance

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Petitioner (Member of Golden Grain Limited)

Applicant

Registrar of Companies

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the name of Golden Grain Limited should be restored to the Register of Companies after being struck off for failure to file annual returns.
  2. 2 Whether the petitioner is entitled to costs given the failure to file annual returns was due to oversight.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the petitioner had demonstrated sufficient grounds for the restoration of Golden Grain Limited to the Register of Companies. The company continued to operate, owned property, and the failure to file annual returns was due to oversight rather than deliberate non-compliance. The Registrar of Companies did not oppose the application. However, since the petitioner did not provide a satisfactory explanation for the failure to file returns, the court exercised its discretion to deny costs. The restoration was ordered, with the requirement that the restoration be advertised in the Kenya Gazette at the company's expense.

Court Disposition

petition allowed in part

Orders

  • The name GOLDEN GRAIN LIMITED be restored to the Register of Companies in Kenya.
  • Such restoration on the register of GOLDEN GRAIN Ltd be advertised in Kenya Gazette at the costs of the company.