[2016] KEHC 1459 (KLR)

[2016] KEHC 1459 (KLR)

The court found that the Applicants satisfied all statutory requirements for local adoption under the Children Act, 2001. The child was abandoned, declared free for adoption, and has been in the continuous care of the Applicants, who have demonstrated emotional and financial capacity to provide for her. Reports from...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] KEHC 1459 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: N G M; Applicant: N N K; Respondent: Baby G S (to be known as G N G)
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Adoption Cause 171 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Judgment
Outcome
adoption granted
Judges
LA Achode
Legal Topics
Adoption Procedure, Best Interests of Child, Parental Responsibility
Source Language
en
Family and Children Adoption Procedure Best Interests of Child Parental Responsibility

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

N G M

Applicant

N N K

Applicant

Baby G S (to be known as G N G)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Adoption Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the Applicants meet the legal requirements for adoption under the Children Act, 2001.
  2. 2 Whether the adoption is in the best interests of the child as required by Article 53(2) of the Constitution and Section 4(3) of the Children Act.
  3. 3 Whether all procedural and statutory safeguards for adoption have been satisfied.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Applicants satisfied all statutory requirements for local adoption under the Children Act, 2001. The child was abandoned, declared free for adoption, and has been in the continuous care of the Applicants, who have demonstrated emotional and financial capacity to provide for her. Reports from the adoption society, guardian ad litem, and Director of Children’s Services all recommended the adoption. The court held that the best interests of the child would be served by granting the adoption, as the child would benefit from a loving family environment rather than institutional care. The court therefore allowed the application and granted the adoption orders sought.

Court Disposition

adoption granted

Orders

  • The Applicants, N G M and N N K, are allowed to adopt Baby G S, who shall henceforth be known as G N G.
  • The child’s date of birth is presumed to be 24th April 2013 and place of birth Gatundu, Kenya.