[2021] KEHC 4296 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 4296 (KLR)

The court held that the recognition of the German insolvency proceedings and the terms of the recognition order govern the treatment of the company's assets and creditors in Kenya. The court found no circumstances justifying preferential treatment for Kenyan creditors, including the Kenya Revenue Authority and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 4296 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Dr Georg Bernsau (Foreign Representative of HP Gauff Ingeniure Gmbh & Co. KG-JBG); Respondent: Employees of HP Gauff Ingeniure Gmbh & Co. KG-JBG; Respondent: Kenya Revenue Authority (Commissioner of Domestic Taxes)
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Application E725 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Transfer of Assets in Cross Border Insolvency
Outcome
Application allowed in part; prayers 1, 2, and 3 granted.
Judges
DAS Majanja
Legal Topics
Cross Border Insolvency, Asset Transfer in Insolvency, Creditor Priority, Recognition of Foreign Proceedings
Source Language
en
Commercial and Corporate Civil Procedure Cross Border Insolvency Asset Transfer in Insolvency Creditor Priority Recognition of Foreign Proceedings

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Dr Georg Bernsau (Foreign Representative of HP Gauff Ingeniure Gmbh & Co. KG-JBG)

Applicant

Employees of HP Gauff Ingeniure Gmbh & Co. KG-JBG

Respondent

Kenya Revenue Authority (Commissioner of Domestic Taxes)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Transfer of Assets in Cross Border Insolvency

  1. 1 Whether the court should allow the transfer of the company's assets in Kenya to the insolvency estate in Germany for the benefit of all creditors.
  2. 2 Whether Kenyan creditors, including employees and the Kenya Revenue Authority, are entitled to preferential treatment or security before such transfer.
  3. 3 Whether the recognition order previously issued by the court governs the treatment of Kenyan assets and creditors in the ongoing insolvency.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the recognition of the German insolvency proceedings and the terms of the recognition order govern the treatment of the company's assets and creditors in Kenya. The court found no circumstances justifying preferential treatment for Kenyan creditors, including the Kenya Revenue Authority and employees, over other creditors. Granting such preference would undermine the principle of equal treatment of creditors in insolvency and would amount to the Kenyan court taking over the insolvency proceedings, contrary to the Fifth Schedule of the Insolvency Act. The court therefore allowed the transfer of assets as sought in prayers 1, 2, and 3 of the application, subject to...

Court Disposition

Application allowed in part; prayers 1, 2, and 3 granted.

Orders

  • Transfer of specified motor vehicles and USD 10,891.56 received in respect of Project 3521-7663-A to Gauff Consultants Africa Limited.
  • Payment of EUR 50,000.00 by Gauff Consultants Africa Limited to be received and paid into the insolvency estate accounts in Germany.