[2018] KEHC 5022 (KLR)
The court found that the applicants had satisfied all legal and social requirements for local adoption under the Children Act, 2001. The reports from the adoption society, guardian ad litem, and Director of Children Services confirmed the applicants' suitability and the positive impact of the adoption on the child's...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEHC 5022 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: COO; Applicant: MAO; Respondent: Baby IFE (to be known as EJAO)
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Adoption Cause 126 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Adoption Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- adoption granted
- Judges
- LA Achode
- Legal Topics
- Adoption Procedure, Best Interests of Child, Parental Responsibility
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
COO
Applicant
MAO
Applicant
Baby IFE (to be known as EJAO)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants meet the legal and social requirements for local adoption under the Children Act, 2001.
- 2 Whether the adoption is in the best interests of the child as required by Article 53(2) of the Constitution and section 4(3) of the Children Act.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants had satisfied all legal and social requirements for local adoption under the Children Act, 2001. The reports from the adoption society, guardian ad litem, and Director of Children Services confirmed the applicants' suitability and the positive impact of the adoption on the child's welfare. The court emphasized that the best interests of the child, as mandated by Article 53(2) of the Constitution and section 4(3) of the Children Act, were served by granting the adoption. The child had bonded with the applicants, regarded them as parents, and would benefit from a stable family environment rather than institutional care. The court therefore allowed the...
Court Disposition
adoption granted
Orders
- The applicants COO and MAO are allowed to adopt Baby IFE, who shall henceforth be known as EJAO.
- The child's date of birth is presumed to be 4th May, 2013, and place of birth Machakos, Kenya.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
34 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAIROBI
ADOPTION CAUSE NO. 126 OF 2017 (O.S)
IN THE MATTER OF THE CHILDREN’S ACT NO. 8 OF 2001
IN THE MATTER OF ADOPTION OF BABY IFE
BY
COO AND MAO (APPLICANTS)
JUDGMENT
1. The Applicants COO and MAO are in a monogamous marriage which after cohabiting for 21 years, was solemnized through a civil marriage held on 16th December, 2015. They have four biological children namely:
a. JA born on 30th March, 1996
b. KO born on 29th July, 1997
c. EA born on 27th December, 2001
d. BO born on 21st February, 2008
2. They wish to adopt the child known as Baby F E, through the Originating Summons dated 31st July, 2017. From the pleadings the court gathers that COO is a chef at [particulars withheld], while MAO is a co-director at [particulars withheld]. They reside in Ruiru and both profess the Christian faith.
3. Records indicate that the minor in this matter was born on 4th May, 2013 from an unfortunate incident of gang rape in Machakos where the rape victim’s (biological mother) father was killed. The biological mother opted to carry the pregnancy to term and later give up the child for adoption. She gave up the baby to Good Samaritan Children’s Home through the help of her close friend whom she had requested to put her in contact with an organization, or someone who could adopt the baby after delivery.
4. On 28th April, 2013 the biological mother signed an agreement stating that she would not claim the baby. On 26th June, 2015 she wrote another letter of consent allowing the baby be admitted at Cindi’s Hope Children’s Home. The child was committed to the home by the Nairobi Children’s court vide P&C Case No. 146/2015.
5. Prior to the hearing of the adoption application, Change Trust Adoption Society prepared and filed a report in court. They also issued a certificate No. [Particulars Withheld] dated 8th December, 2016 declaring the child free for adoption. The guardian ad litem M M filed a report dated 20th February, 2018 which was favourable and recommended the adoption of the child by the Applicants.
6. An officer in the office of The Director of Children Services made home visits and established that the Applicants are financially and emotionally capable of providing for the up keep and education of the child. She filed a report dated 5th March, 2018 recommending the adoption for reasons that the child stands to gain from the opportunities provided by becoming the daughter of the Applicants as opposed to living all her life in an institution as an abandoned child.
7. The child was in court during the hearing and appeared to have bonded well with the Applicants. She was calm and clearly seemed to trust the Applicants. She regarded them as her parents. The Applicants’ family members are said to be aware of the proposed adoption and support it.
8. It is important to note that, the orders sought by the Applicants relate to a child. In any matter concerning a child the best interests of a child are what is of paramount importance as provided for under Article 53(2) of theConstitution and section 4(3)of the Children Act No. 8of2001.
9. I note that this is a local adoption and the Applicants, in my opinion have fulfilled the requirements for local adoption under the Children Act, 2001. They have proved during the placement period prior to adoption that they are capable of taking on the challenge of raising the child in this matter. Secondly, the Applicants meet the social parameters that are considered relevant to their taking on parental responsibility and custody of the child in this matter, on a permanent basis as would be conferred by the adoption order sought.
10. From the foregoing, this court has formed the opinion that it is in the best interest of the child to be adopted by the Applicants. Reasons wherefore, I allow the prayers sought in the Originating Summons dated 31st July, 2017 and order as follows:
i. The Applicants, COO and MAO are hereby allowed to adopt Baby IFE who shall henceforth be known as EJAO.
ii. Her date of birth shall be presumed to be 4th May, 2013. She is presumed to have been born in Kenya in accordance with Article 14(1)of theConstitution,and the place of birth shall be Machakos.
iii. G W K, is hereby appointed legal guardian of the child in the event that the Applicants die, or are incapacitated by ill-health.
iv. The Registrar General is directed to enter this order in the Adoption Register.
v. The Director of Immigration is hereby authorised to issue the child with a Kenyan passport.
vi. The guardian ad litem is hereby discharged.
It is so ordered.
SIGNED DATED and DELIVERED in open court this 26th day of July 2018
........................
L.A ACHODE
JUDGE