[2024] KEHC 15933 (KLR)

[2024] KEHC 15933 (KLR)

The court found that the applicants, a married couple, had fulfilled all legal requirements for adoption, including providing evidence of a valid surrogacy agreement, DNA confirmation of the 2nd applicant's genetic link to the minor, and written consent from the surrogate mother relinquishing her parental rights....

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEHC 15933 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: NM Were; Applicant: NAO Matar; Respondent: Caroline Achieng' Wanunda
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Adoption Cause E226 of 2024
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Judgment
Outcome
adoption granted
Judges
SN Riechi
Legal Topics
Adoption of Minors, Surrogacy Arrangements, Parental Rights, Best Interests of Child
Source Language
en
Family and Children Adoption of Minors Surrogacy Arrangements Parental Rights Best Interests of Child

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

NM Were

Applicant

NAO Matar

Applicant

Caroline Achieng' Wanunda

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Adoption Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the applicants have met the legal requirements for adoption of the minor born through gestational surrogacy.
  2. 2 Whether the adoption is in the best interests of the child as required by law.
  3. 3 Whether the surrogate mother has lawfully relinquished her parental rights.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants, a married couple, had fulfilled all legal requirements for adoption, including providing evidence of a valid surrogacy agreement, DNA confirmation of the 2nd applicant's genetic link to the minor, and written consent from the surrogate mother relinquishing her parental rights. Reports from the adoption society, guardian ad litem, and the Children’s Department confirmed the applicants' suitability and the child’s best interests. The court emphasized that the best interests of the child, as mandated by Article 53(2) of the Constitution and Section 8 of the Children’s Act, 2022, are paramount. The adoption was found to be in the child’s best interests,...

Court Disposition

adoption granted

Orders

  • The applicants NM Were and NAO Matar are allowed to adopt IGM.
  • JAA is appointed the legal guardian of the child.