[2015] KEHC 6164 (KLR)
The court found that the applicants had fulfilled all statutory requirements for adoption under the Children Act, 2001. The child was abandoned and the biological parents could not be traced, making it lawful to dispense with their consent. The applicants demonstrated financial and emotional capability to care for...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2015] KEHC 6164 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: E C J; Applicant: C A O
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Adoption Cause 135 of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Adoption Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- Adoption granted.
- Judges
- MW Muigai
- Legal Topics
- Adoption Procedure, Best Interests of Child, Abandoned Children
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
E C J
Applicant
C A O
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants have met the legal requirements for adoption under the Children Act, 2001.
- 2 Whether it is in the best interests of the child to be adopted by the applicants.
- 3 Whether the consent of the biological parents can be dispensed with due to abandonment.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants had fulfilled all statutory requirements for adoption under the Children Act, 2001. The child was abandoned and the biological parents could not be traced, making it lawful to dispense with their consent. The applicants demonstrated financial and emotional capability to care for the child, as confirmed by the Adoption Society, the Director of Children’s Services, and the guardian ad litem. The court observed a strong bond between the applicants and the child, and determined that adoption would serve the child’s best interests. Accordingly, the court allowed the adoption, granted parental rights to the applicants, and appointed legal guardians for the...
Court Disposition
Adoption granted.
Orders
- The applicants, E C J and C A O, are allowed to adopt Baby J.
- The child shall henceforth be known as S A A J.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
15 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
ADOPTION CAUSE NO. 135 OF 2014
IN THE MATTER OF THE CHILDREN ACT, 2001
AND
IN THE MATTER OF BABY J
E C J.……..………………………………………………1ST APPLICANT
C A O…………..…….……………………….…………..2NDAPPLICANT
J U D G M E N T
The applicants, E C J and C A O, are husband and wife. They were married under Luo customary law on 23rd August 2005. They formalized their marriage on 4th December 2012 when they were married at the Registrar's Office in Nairobi. The 1st applicant is employed as a senior program officer with [particulars withheld] while the 2nd applicant is employed by the [particulars withheld] as an accountant. The Applicants have not been blessed with children of their own due to medical reasons. They wish to adopt a child. They have applied to this court to be allowed to adopt baby Juanita (the child). The child was presumed to have been born on 18th August 2011. She was found abandoned on 17th July 2012 by a good Samaritan in Transami within Embakasi area in Nairobi. A report was made on 18th July 2012 to Embakasi Police Station. The child was then placed with Thomas Barnardo House for care and protection. She was committed by the Nairobi Children’s Court to the custody of the said Children’s Home on 24th September 2012 pending formal adoption proceedings. The Applicants were given custody of the child for mandatory foster care pending adoption pursuant to a foster care agreement which was signed on 2nd April 2013. They took custody of the child on the same day. Since then, the child has been in the continuous custody and care of the applicants.
Prior to the hearing of the adoption, the Adoption Society, Kenya Children’s Home, prepared a report which is filed in court. They also issued a certificate declaring the child free for adoption. The certificate is dated 12th February 2013. The Director of Children’s Services has also prepared a report which is on record. The guardian ad litem, N M M, prepared a report which has been filed in court. All the reports are favourable and recommend that the court allows the applicants to adopt the child. I have evaluated the facts of this adoption. This is a local adoption. It is evident that the applicants have fulfilled all the legal requirements pertaining to the adoption of the child. The consent of the biological parents of the child was dispensed with since the child was abandoned. They cannot be traced to give their consent. This court is satisfied that the applicants are qualified and able to take care of the child. The home visits by the guardian ad litem, the Adoption Society and the Director of the Children Services established that the applicants have the financial and emotional capability to provide for the upkeep and education of the child. This court observed the applicants with the child in court. It was evident that in the period that the applicants have had the custody of the child, the child has bonded well with them. The child considers the applicants her parents.
This court formed the opinion that it would be in the best interest of the child to be adopted by the applicants. I allow the applicants’ application for adoption. The applicants, E C J and C A O, are hereby allowed to adopt Baby J. Henceforth, the child shall be known as S A A J. Her date of birth shall be 18th August 2011. Her Place of birth shall be Nairobi- Kenya. She is therefore presumed to be a citizen of Kenya by birth. J A O and M S M, the sister and brother-in-law respectively to the 2nd applicant, shall be the legal guardians of the child should such eventuality arise. I direct the Registrar General to enter this order in the adoption register. I hereby discharge the guardian ad litem. It is so ordered.
DATED AT NAIROBI THIS 23RD DAY OF JANUARY, 2015
M. MUIGAI
JUDGE