Kenya Judgment

High Court · High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)

In re J B (Minor) [2017] KEHC 3687 (KLR)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The court found that the applicant, Dr. N R M, satisfied all statutory requirements for adoption under the Children Act 2001. The child, Baby J B, was abandoned at birth, declared free for adoption, and has not been claimed by any relatives. The applicant has demonstrated emotional and financial capacity to care for the child, and the child has bonded well with the applicant and her family. Reports from the Director of Children Services, the adoption society, and the Guardian ad Litem all support the adoption, confirming that it is in the best interests of the child. The court concluded that granting the adoption would provide the child with a stable, loving, and permanent family environment, which is in line with the principles of the Children Act. Accordingly, the adoption was allowed, the child was renamed M M M, and legal guardians were appointed in the event of misfortune befalling the applicant.

Court disposition

adoption granted

Orders

  • The applicant, Dr. N R M, is authorized to adopt Baby J B, who shall henceforth be known as M M M.
  • D M and C W are appointed as legal guardians of the child should misfortune befall the applicant.
  • The Registrar General is directed to enter this order in the adoption register.
  • The Guardian ad Litem is discharged.

02

Material facts

Parties

Dr. N R M

Applicant Counsel: Ms. L. Kiguatha

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Adoption Cause / Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The applicant, Dr. N R M, seeks to adopt Baby J B, motivated by the desire to provide her biological daughter with a sibling and to offer a home and security to a child in need. She has previously adopted a child and is unable to have more biological children. She has demonstrated the ability to provide parental care and financial support, and has bonded with the minor during the statutory placement period. The adoption is supported by her extended family and the relevant adoption society.
Respondent
There is no formal respondent; however, the Director of Children Services and the Guardian ad Litem both filed reports supporting the adoption. They confirm the applicant's suitability, emotional and financial capacity, and the child's availability for adoption, recommending that the adoption be granted as it is in the best interests of the child.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Section 4(2), Children Act 2001

    The best interests of the child are paramount in adoption proceedings.

  2. 02

    Section 156(1), Children Act 2001

    A child may be adopted if declared free for adoption and no relatives have claimed the child.

  3. 03

    Children Act 2001; Director of Children Services Report

    The applicant must demonstrate capacity to provide parental care and financial support.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The court found that the applicant, Dr. N R M, satisfied all statutory requirements for adoption under the Children Act 2001. The child, Baby J B, was abandoned at birth, declared free for adoption, and has not been claimed by any relatives. The applicant has demonstrated emotional and financial capacity to care for the child, and the child has bonded well with the applicant and her family. Reports from the Director of Children Services, the adoption society, and the Guardian ad Litem all support the adoption, confirming that it is in the best interests of the child. The court concluded that granting the adoption would provide the child with a stable, loving, and permanent family environment, which is in line with the principles of the Children Act. Accordingly, the adoption was allowed, the child was renamed M M M, and legal guardians were appointed in the event of misfortune befalling the applicant.

Obiter and limits

  • Adoption is a noble act that provides children who would otherwise grow up in children's homes with love and personal attention.
  • The applicant's motivation to provide her daughter with a sibling and to offer a home to a child in need is commendable.
  • The applicant has complied with all legal requirements for a local adoption.

Court disposition

adoption granted

  • The applicant, Dr. N R M, is authorized to adopt Baby J B, who shall henceforth be known as M M M.
  • D M and C W are appointed as legal guardians of the child should misfortune befall the applicant.
  • The Registrar General is directed to enter this order in the adoption register.
  • The Guardian ad Litem is discharged.

Source and reliance status

High Court

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

High Court

Judgment

[2017] KEHC 3687 (KLR)

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI

ADOPTION CAUSE NO. 41 OF 2016

IN THE MATTER OF BABY J B (MINOR)

N R M……………………………. APPLICANT

JUDGMENT

1. Dr. N R M the applicant in this adoption cause is seeking to be authorized to adopt Baby J B and if allowed the child to be known as M M M. She also seeks that the Registrar General be directed to enter the adoption in the Adopted Children Register. That D Mand C W be appointed as the legal guardians of the child.

2. From the statement filed by the applicant this is what I gather: she was born on the 16th November 1962 and raised in Embu though she spent much of her time in Nairobi. She has one child a daughter called K M who is currently about 15 years. She states that her main motivation to adopt is to have her daughter have a sibling as she was raised in a big family and appreciates the support she get from her siblings and she would like her daughter to enjoy the same. She also desires to provide a child with a home and some security. She is not able to have biological children as she is past menopause. That this is the second adoption and she has interacted with other adopting parents. She considers adoption a noble thing as it makes children’s who would otherwise grow in a children home without personal attention, love and personal attention.

3. The child was presumably born on 11/06/2010. She was found abandoned beside Kenyatta way on the 13/06/2010. She was rescued by a good Samaritan who reported the matter at Kahawa Sukari Police Station where it was booked as OB/No. [Particulars withheld]. The child was presented before the Children’s Court at Thika where she was committed and placed under the care of Children Karibuni Organization Thika on 16/12/2010, for care and protection. The child is currently living with the applicant and her daughter in[ particulars withheld]. The minor was declared free for adoption prior to placement by the KKPI Adoption Society’s case committee sitting on 26th November 2014 and a freeing certificate Serial No. [particulars withheld] issued pursuant to section 156(1) of the Children’s Act 2001. The society recommends that the child be adopted by the applicant. As per the report the applicant was found to be a responsible and caring person given that the proof can be seen in the applicant’s first adopted daughter and has demonstrated the ability to take care and provide parental responsibilities to the child for over twelve months. The child was committed to the protection of Karibu Centre and has not been claimed since abandonment.

4. The Director of Children Services filed their report on the 9th June 2017. It gives their findings on the applicant’s background and current status. The applicant has been living with the child since 19/01/2015. She has adequately provided for the minor, the applicant is a responsible, mature, emotionally and financially capable to provide for the child. There appears to be perfect bonding between the child and the prospective applicants. The proposed adoption has a wider family and social support from her siblings and extended family.

5. The recommendation from the Director of Children services is as follows; that this is a local adoption under the Children Act 2001 that the applicant has proved capable of taking on parental responsibility over the child in the matter during the statutory placement period prior to adoption during which she has been under her continuous care and control. Socially the applicant qualifies as she has been assessed and found fit to take on the parental responsibilities upon the child permanently as would be conferred on her by the adoption orders sought. She is also in a position to financially provide for the child. She appears to be able ready and determined to adopt a child who requires and deserves this alternative family care. The child in this matter is considered available for adoption having been abandoned at birth. None of her relatives has so far claimed her. Adoption therefore offers her the perfect alternative family. In this proposed adoption, she stands to gain a parent. She is doing well under the care of the prospective adoptive parents whom she has also bonded well with. Adoption would certainly be in her best interests. She has been duly declared free for adoption. The report therefore recommends that the court ruled in favor of the applicant to adopt the child and on adoption the child will be renamed M M M

6. J N K the Guardian ad Litem in her report dated 10th July 2017 2017 states that the child has bonded well with the applicant and her sibling K. They agree on many matters and she looks generally happy and comfortable. The child is very well looked after, she is smartly dressed and her hair well-kept and also looks very healthy. That the applicant seems capable of raising the child and as per the decision of the court, she has no objection to her being granted orders to adopt the child.

7. I have considered the all that is before me together with the interview done in court and am persuaded that the applicant is suitable to adopt the minor. The child was abandoned and the applicant has taken her in loves and is caring for her. This is also a local adoption and the applicant has complied with the provisions of the law on adoption, the adoption shall be in the best interest of the child. The ApplicantDr. N R M is hereby allowed to adopt baby J B. She shall henceforth be known as M M M. D M and C Wshall be the legal Guardian of the child should misfortune befall the applicants. I direct the Registrar General to enter this order in the adoption register. The Guardian ad Litem is hereby discharged. It is so ordered.

Dated, signed and delivered this 4thday of August 2017

R. E. OUGO

JUDGE

Ms. L. Kiguatha For the Applicant

Ms Charity Court clerk

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Children Act 2001, Section 4(2)

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Children Act 2001, Section 156(1)

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.