[2025] KEHC 7049 (KLR)

[2025] KEHC 7049 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant, as the child’s paternal grandmother, had fulfilled all statutory requirements for kinship adoption, including obtaining the necessary consents from the biological father and proposed legal guardian. The court considered the reports from the adoption society, guardian ad litem, and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KEHC 7049 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: CJW; Respondent: JCM
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Adoption Cause E047 of 2024
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Judgment
Outcome
adoption granted
Judges
SN Riechi
Legal Topics
Kinship Adoption, Best Interests of Child, Consent of Biological Parent, Appointment of Legal Guardian
Source Language
en
Family and Children Kinship Adoption Best Interests of Child Consent of Biological Parent Appointment of Legal Guardian

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

CJW

Applicant

JCM

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Adoption Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has met the legal requirements for kinship adoption under Kenyan law.
  2. 2 Whether the adoption is in the best interests of the child as required by Article 53(2) of the Constitution and Section 8 of the Children’s Act, 2022.
  3. 3 Whether the necessary consents from the biological parent and legal guardian have been obtained.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant, as the child’s paternal grandmother, had fulfilled all statutory requirements for kinship adoption, including obtaining the necessary consents from the biological father and proposed legal guardian. The court considered the reports from the adoption society, guardian ad litem, and Children Services, all of which recommended the adoption. The applicant demonstrated financial, emotional, and physical capacity to care for the child, and there was no evidence of any criminal record or incapacity. The court applied the principle that the best interests of the child are paramount, as enshrined in Article 53(2) of the Constitution and Section 8 of the...

Court Disposition

adoption granted

Orders

  • The applicant CJW is allowed to adopt JCM.
  • The child shall henceforth be known as JCM.