[2016] KEHC 1122 (KLR)

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI

ADOPTION CAUSE NO. 191 OF 2015 (OS)

IN THE MATTER OF THE CHILDREN’S ACT NO. 8 OF 2001

IN THE MATTER OF ADOPTION OF BABY J I

BY

D N K AND A N K (APPLICANTS)

JUDGMENT

1. The Applicants D N K and A N K are in a monogamous marriage which was solemnized at the Officer of the Registrar in Nairobi on 26th September, 2014. They have no chid of their own.

2. The Applicants wish to adopt the child known as Baby J a minor of male sex, through the Originating Summons dated 5th August, 2014. They indicate that D N K is a businessman while A N K is a banker with [Particulars withheld] Bank. They reside in Kahawa West, Nairobi and are both Christians.

3. The record indicates that the child in this matter was abandoned at [Particulars withheld] village, Sachangwan location in Molo on 22nd September, 2013 aged about one week. The child was discovered and rescued by one Joseph Malakwen and his neighbour from his pit latrine. The matter was reported to the area chief who referred it to Sachangwan Police Patrol Base, where it was booked vide OB No. [Particulars withheld]. The child was admitted to New Life Home for care and protection on the same date.

4. On 24th September, 2013 the child was officially committed to the same home by the Molo Children’s court vide P&C Case No. 50/13 at the recommendation of the Children’s officer. The biological parents of the child were not traced, nor did anyone come forward to claim her.

5. The child was declared free for adoption on 6th February, 2015 by the Little Angels Network, vide certificate No.[Particulars withheld] in accordance with Section 156of theChildren Act 2001. The child was released to the Applicant for foster care upon the signing of foster care agreement on 25th November, 2014. Since then he has been in the continuous custody and care of the Applicants.

6. Prior to the hearing of the adoption application, Little Angels Network an adoption society, prepared and filed a report in court. The Adoption Society, guardian ad litem and the Director of Children’s Services have all made home visits and established that the Applicants are financially and emotionally capable of providing for the up keep and education of the child.

7. The Director of Children’s Services also filed a report dated 6th July, 2016 recommending the adoption for reasons that the child stands to gain the opportunities provided by becoming the son of the Applicants and growing up in a loving home and with siblings rather than growing up in an institution.

8. The guardian ad litem, Ms. P W N also filed a report that was favourable and recommended the adoption of the child by the Applicants.

9. The child was in court during the hearing and appeared to have bonded well with the Applicants. He was jovial and related well with the Applicants.

10. After a careful assessment of the reports filed herein and from the observation of the interaction of the Applicants and the child during the hearing, this court has formed the opinion that it would be in the best interest of the child to be adopted by the Applicants.

11. In considering an application such as this, the best interests of the child are paramount. Article 53(2)of theConstitution provides the guiding principle on this issue as follows:

“A child’s best interests are of paramount importance in every matter concerning the child.”

This principle also finds expression under the Children Act No. 8of 2001, and in particular Section 4(3) thereof.

12. This is a local adoption where the Applicants in my opinion fulfil the requirements for local adoption under the Children Act, 2001. They have proved during the placement period prior to adoption that they are capable of taking on the challenge of raising the child in this matter. Secondly they meet the social parameters that are considered relevant to their taking on parental responsibility and custody of the child in this matter on a permanent basis as would be conferred by the adoption order sought.

13. From the foregoing, this court has formed the opinion that it would be in the best interest of the child to be adopted by the Applicants. Reasons wherefore I allow the prayers sought in the Originating Summons dated 5th August, 2015 and order as follows:

i. The Applicants, D N K and A N K are hereby allowed to adopt Baby Jwho shall henceforth be known as J J K N.

ii. His date of birth shall be presumed to be 15th September, 2013. He is presumed to have been born in Kenya in accordance with Article 14 (3)of theConstitution, and the place of birth shall be Molo.

iii. P W N and S M K are hereby appointed legal guardians of the child in the event that the Applicants die or are incapacitated by ill-health.

iv. The Registrar General is directed to enter this order in the Adoption Register.

v. The Director of Immigration is hereby authorised to issue the child with a Kenyan passport.

vi. The guardian ad litem is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

SIGNED DATEDandDELIVEREDin open court this 10th day of November, 2016.

…………………………………….

L. A. ACHODE

JUDGE

In the presence of ……………………Advocate for the Applicants