[2017] KEHC 979 (KLR)
The court found that the Applicants, being relatives of the child and having provided consistent financial and emotional support, had fulfilled all statutory requirements for adoption under the Children Act, 2001. The consents of the biological parents and the child, who is above 14 years, were validly obtained and...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] KEHC 979 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: M M K; Applicant: Z M N-M; Respondent: J K M
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Adoption Cause 155 of 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Adoption Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- adoption granted
- Judges
- MW Muigai
- Legal Topics
- Adoption Procedure, Kinship Adoption, Consent of Parents, Child Welfare, Guardian Ad Litem, Adoption Register
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
M M K
Applicant
Z M N-M
Applicant
J K M
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Applicants have met the legal requirements for adoption under the Children Act, 2001.
- 2 Whether the consents of the biological parents and the child are valid and sufficient for the adoption.
- 3 Whether the adoption is in the best interest of the child.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the Applicants, being relatives of the child and having provided consistent financial and emotional support, had fulfilled all statutory requirements for adoption under the Children Act, 2001. The consents of the biological parents and the child, who is above 14 years, were validly obtained and on record. Statutory reports from the adoption society, the Director of Children Services, and the guardian ad litem all recommended the adoption, confirming the Applicants' suitability and the best interests of the child. The court was satisfied that the Applicants are capable of providing for the child's welfare and that the adoption would serve the child's best interests....
Court Disposition
adoption granted
Orders
- The Applicants, M M K and Z M N-M, are allowed to adopt the child, J K M.
- The child shall retain his current name.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
20 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
ADOPTION CAUSE NO. 155 OF 2016
IN THE MATTER OF THE CHILDREN ACT, 2001
AND
IN THE MATTER OF J K M (MINOR)
M M K …………….….………………….… 1ST APPLICANT
Z M N –M…………………….……....….… 2ND APPLICANT
JUDGMENT
The Applicants, M M K (“the 1st Applicant”) and Z M N- M (“the 2nd Applicant”), seek by their application filed on 1st December 2016 to be allowed by this Court to adopt J K M, a minor (hereafter “the child”). The Applicants are husband and wife. They are citizens of Kenya as evidenced in their annexed copies of their passports. They celebrated their marriage on 29th November 2008 under the African Christian Marriage and Divorce Act (now repealed). Both Applicants live together in Massachusetts, USA where the 1st Applicant is employed as a teacher at [particulars withheld] and the 2nd Applicant works as a counselor at [particulars withheld] Home.
The child who is the subject of the present adoption proceedings was born on 5th June 2001. He is born to M M K and R W N. The 1st Applicant is an uncle to the child in that the child is borne by his brother. Although the child has been living with his parents, the Applicants have been rendering financial and welfare support to him. The child’s biological parents have given their consents to the proposed adoption. A copy of the said consent is on the court record. The child being above fourteen (14) years of age has given his consent as required. A copy of the child’s consent is also on the court record. This is therefore a kinship adoption.
The adoption society, KKPI issued a certificate declaring the child free for adoption pursuant to Section 156(1)of theChildren Act. The said freeing certificate is no. [particulars withheld] and the same is dated 31st August 2016. In their application filed on 1st December 2016, the Applicants sought among others, orders from this Court that L M P be appointed as the child’s guardian ad litem, and that the Director of Children Services be ordered to investigate the suitability of the Applicants to adopt the child and submit a report. The Applicants also sought to have the Court appoint the 1st Applicant’s brother, F K K as the child’s legal guardian. On 2nd November 2017, this Court issued an order appointing L M Pas the child’s guardian ad litem, and further directed the guardian ad litem and the Director of Children Services to file their respective reports in Court within fourty five (45) days.
Pursuant to Section 156(1)of theChildren Act, before this matter came up for hearing, KKPI, the relevant adoption society, prepared and filed in Court a favorable report in respect of the proposed adoption of the child by the Applicants. Another report in respect of the proposed adoption of the child by the Applicants was prepared by the Director of Children Services, and this report was similarly in favour of the proposed adoption. The guardian ad litem, L M P, also filed the statutory report made under Section 160(2)of theChildren Act in which she noted that the proposed adoption of the child by the Applicant is in the best interest of the child.
All the statutory reports that have been filed in respect of the proposed adoption of the child by the Applicants have recommended that this Court allows the Applicants to adopt the child. This Court has evaluated the facts of this adoption. This is a local adoption. It is evident that the Applicants have fulfilled all the legal requirements relative to the adoption of the child. The child’s parents testified in court that they have agreed to the child being adopted by the Applicants who are also relatives. The child himself testified before this court that he has also agreed to be adopted by the Applicants. This Court has satisfied itself that the Applicants are qualified and able to take care of the child. The home visits by the guardian ad litem, the adoption society and the Director of the Children Services established that the Applicants have the financial and emotional capability to provide for the upkeep and education of the child.
On the basis of a careful examination of the documents presented before me as well as the observations made therein, this Court has formed the opinion that it would be in the best interest of the child to be adopted by the Applicants. Hence, this Court allows the Applicants application. M M K (“the 1st Applicant”) and Z M N- M, (“the 2nd Applicant”) are hereby allowed to adopt the child, J K M. The child shall retain his current name. The 1st Applicant’s brother, F K K, shall be the legal guardian of the child should such eventuality arise. This Court directs the Registrar General to duly enter this order in the Adoption Register. The guardian ad litem is hereby discharged. It is so ordered.
DATED AT NAIROBI THIS 20TH DAY NOVEMBER OF 2017
M. W. MUIGAI
JUDGE
In presence of:- ……………………….
…………………………………............…