[2023] KEHC 3571 (KLR)
The court found that the applicants satisfied all statutory requirements for adoption under the Children Act, 2001. The child had been declared free for adoption by the relevant authority, and the applicants were not disqualified under section 186. Reports from the adoption society and the Directorate of Children...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEHC 3571 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: JW; Applicant: JM
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Adoption Cause E170 of 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Adoption Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- originating summons allowed; adoption granted
- Judges
- DKN Magare
- Legal Topics
- Adoption Order, Child Welfare, Guardianship, Parental Rights
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
JW
Applicant
JM
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants meet the legal requirements for adoption under the Children Act, 2001.
- 2 Whether the child is eligible for adoption and has been declared free for adoption as required by law.
- 3 Whether the applicants are disqualified from adopting under section 186 of the Children Act, 2001.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants satisfied all statutory requirements for adoption under the Children Act, 2001. The child had been declared free for adoption by the relevant authority, and the applicants were not disqualified under section 186. Reports from the adoption society and the Directorate of Children Services confirmed the suitability of the applicants and recommended the adoption. The court exercised its discretion in favour of the applicants, finding that the adoption would serve the best interests of the child. Accordingly, the originating summons was allowed, and the orders sought were granted, including the authorization to adopt, appointment of legal guardians, and...
Court Disposition
originating summons allowed; adoption granted
Orders
- The applicants JMM and JWN are authorized to adopt the child known as baby JL, to be known as EKM.
- PNN and JNK are appointed as the legal guardians of the child.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
23 paragraphs
In re JL aka EKM (Child) (Adoption Cause E170 of 2022) [2023] KEHC 3571 (KLR) (Family) (27 April 2023) (Judgment)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 3571 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Family
Adoption Cause E170 of 2022
DKN Magare, J
April 27, 2023
IN THE MATTER OF THE CHILDREN ACT, 2001 AND IN THE MATTER OF APPLICATION FOR ADOPTION OF BABY JL AKA EKM.......... THE CHILD BY
In the matter of
JW
1st Applicant
JM
2nd Applicant
Judgment
1. This matter came before me on April 13, 2023 during the rapid result initiative. I Heard witnesses and reserved Judgment for today April 27, 2023.
2. On December 1, 2022, Honourable Justice SN Riechi had allowed Chamber Summons Application dated September 20, 2022. The court appointed PKS as the Guardian ad litem. The Guardian ad litem and the secretary of children services were to file reports by March 30, 2023. The Deputy Registrar placed the matter before me on April 13, 2023, where I heard witnesses and reserved Judgment for today.
3. The Applicant testified that they are ready for the adoption Peter Ndotono from the adoption Society stated that the child was freed for adoption on February 16, 2022 vide certificate No 827. They recommended the adoption. Kenya Children’s Homes Adoption Society prepared the declaration report, freely certificate, freeing summary, care against and case committee agreement and case committee ratification forms for the baby. The child directorate of children service prepared its reports as ordered. and recommended the adoption.
4. I have to exercise my discretion whether to allow this adoption I have seen the income and financials by the Applicants are health. The recommendations show that they are suitable parents. The Appellants have a requisite age difference and meet the minimum threshold, as to age. They are qualified by dint of Section 184 and 183 of theChildren’s Act to adopt. Section 184 provides as follows: -Pre-requisites for Adoption.(1)A person shall not commence any arrangements for the adoption of a child unless—(a)the Council, in accordance with the rules, has declared the child free for adoption; and(b)the child has attained the age of six weeks.(2)A person, including a parent, guardian or adoption society, shall not, prior to the making of an adoption order, entrust a child to the care, possession or control of any person not qualified to adopt a child in accordance with this Act.(3)An applicant shall not preselect a prospective adoptive child except—(a)in the case of kinship adoption;(b)Where the applicant is a foster parent seeking to adopt a fostered child under the applicant’s care.(4)The Secretary shall monitor and submit reports to the courts on the wellbeing of a child who is subject to adoption proceedings.(5)Any person who contravenes subsections (1) or (2) of this section commits an offence and shall, on conviction, be liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding three years or to a fine not exceeding one million shillings, or to both.
5. Further the Applicant are not disqualified by dint of Article Section 186 of theChildren’s Act. I am inclined to grant the originating summons dated September 20, 2023, which provides as follows: -
6. The Applicant is not disqualified by dint of section 186(6) of the Children’s Act from adopting. The section provides as doth: -The Court shall not make an adoption order in favour of an Applicant or joint Applicants if the Applicant or joint Applicants, or any of them—a)is of unsound mind within the meaning of the Mental Health Act (Cap 248);(b)is incapable of exercising proper care and guardianship of a child;(c)has been convicted by a Court of competent jurisdiction for any of the offences specified in the Third Schedule or similar offences;(d)in the case of joint Applicants, if the Applicants are not married to each other;(e)is a sole male Applicant except where the Applicant is a biological relative of the child; or(f)is a foreign Applicant except where the Applicant is a biological relative of the child.
Determination 7. The upshot of the foregoing is that all the originating summons dated September 20, 2022 in the following terms: -a.The Applicant JMM and JWN be authorized to adopt a child known as baby JL to be known as EKM.b.That PNN and JNK be appointed as the Legal guardian of the child.c.The Guardian ad litem be discharged.d.The child be declared to be born on July 22, 2022 at Kiambu Level 5 Hospitale.The child be presumed as Kenyan by birth.f.The consent of the Biological parents be dispensed with.g.The Director General of Immigration be authorized to issue a passport to the child.h.The Registrar General do enter the adoption in the register of adoptions.i.The Registrar of births and deaths be directed to issue a birth certificate to the child.j.This file is sealed and closed.
DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED AT MOMBASA ON THIS 27TH DAY OF APRIL, 2023. JUDGMENT DELIVERED THROUGH MICROSOFT TEAMS ONLINE PLATFORM.DENNIS KIZITO MAGAREJUDGE OF THE HIGH COURT, MOMBASAIn the presence of:No appearance for the applicantCourt Assistant - Firdaus